Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

electromenager-compare.com

Comparer les lave-linges, lave-vaiselles, réfrigérateurs, aspirateurs, etc. | electromenager-compare.com

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

250 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

784 ms

electromenager-compare.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to electromenager-compare.com homepage info - get ready to check Electromenager Compare best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about electromenager-compare.com

Electromenager COMPARE : Electromenager, lave-linge, sèche-linge, lave-vaisselle, tables de cuisson, réfrigérateurs, congélateurs, fours, cuisinières, piano de cuisson, aspirateurs : comparateur de pr...

Visit electromenager-compare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Electromenager-compare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 250 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

electromenager-compare.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

electromenager-compare.com

250 ms

www.electromenager-compare.com

502 ms

normalize-3.0.2.min.css

286 ms

font-awesome.min.css

282 ms

jquery.qtip.min.css

285 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Electromenager-compare.com, 15% (9 requests) were made to Res.shopping-compare.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Media.conforama.fr.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 247.8 kB (53%)

Content Size

467.8 kB

After Optimization

220.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Electromenager-compare.com main page is 467.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 244.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 64.7 kB

  • Original 78.9 kB
  • After minification 78.8 kB
  • After compression 14.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 18 B

  • Original 101.8 kB
  • After minification 101.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Electromenager Compare images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 151.5 kB

  • Original 244.5 kB
  • After minification 244.3 kB
  • After compression 93.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 151.5 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 31.7 kB

  • Original 42.6 kB
  • After minification 42.4 kB
  • After compression 10.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Electromenager-compare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.7 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (41%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Electromenager Compare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

electromenager-compare.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Electromenager-compare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is French. Our system also found out that Electromenager-compare.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Electromenager Compare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: