2.6 sec in total
46 ms
1.9 sec
658 ms
Welcome to electronicmedicalrecords-emr.com homepage info - get ready to check Electronicmedicalrecords Emr best content right away, or after learning these important things about electronicmedicalrecords-emr.com
心博官方网页版【综合体育、官方网站、体验平台、首页注册、最新网址、官网入口、APP下载】,2011年底由华特控股集团控股,2015年成为华特子公司。心博官方网页版集团注册资本5.1亿元,具有国家公路工程施工总承包壹级、市政公用工程施工总承包壹级,交安、环保、道路照明专业一级,公路养护I类,II类甲、乙级,公路工程综合乙级检测以及房建、水利、国外工程承包等多项资质,覆盖施工、养护、检测、技术研发等领...
Visit electronicmedicalrecords-emr.comWe analyzed Electronicmedicalrecords-emr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
electronicmedicalrecords-emr.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
71/100
10%
Value3.6 s
60/100
25%
Value4.7 s
68/100
10%
Value310 ms
77/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value7.6 s
46/100
10%
46 ms
773 ms
202 ms
243 ms
155 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Electronicmedicalrecords-emr.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (773 ms) belongs to the original domain Electronicmedicalrecords-emr.com.
Page size can be reduced by 83.1 kB (6%)
1.4 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Electronicmedicalrecords-emr.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 939.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 26.3 kB, which is 48% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.2 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Electronicmedicalrecords Emr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 18.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Electronicmedicalrecords-emr.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (61%)
61
24
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Electronicmedicalrecords Emr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
electronicmedicalrecords-emr.com
46 ms
electronicmedicalrecords-emr.com
773 ms
jquery3.js
202 ms
jqueryui3.js
243 ms
dle_js.js
155 ms
bootstrap.min.css
40 ms
font-awesome.min.css
48 ms
themify-icons.css
35 ms
flaticon-set.css
47 ms
magnific-popup.css
60 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
57 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
68 ms
animate.css
69 ms
bootsnav.css
74 ms
style.css
83 ms
responsive.css
83 ms
css2
31 ms
email-decode.min.js
78 ms
jquery-1.12.4.min.js
244 ms
popper.min.js
241 ms
bootstrap.min.js
241 ms
equal-height.min.js
368 ms
jquery.appear.js
369 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
394 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
377 ms
modernizr.custom.13711.js
377 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
388 ms
wow.min.js
498 ms
progress-bar.min.js
498 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
595 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
549 ms
count-to.js
587 ms
YTPlayer.min.js
586 ms
circle-progress.js
630 ms
jquery.nice-select.min.js
664 ms
bootsnav.js
693 ms
main.js
724 ms
embed
467 ms
preloader.gif
367 ms
10.jpg
372 ms
3.svg
385 ms
1.jpg
387 ms
2.jpg
399 ms
3.jpg
397 ms
4.jpg
413 ms
5.jpg
414 ms
6.jpg
410 ms
1.jpg
426 ms
2.jpg
427 ms
7.jpg
426 ms
5.png
437 ms
6.jpg
438 ms
1.jpg
442 ms
2.jpg
439 ms
4.jpg
450 ms
3.jpg
453 ms
footer-bg.png
457 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf
24 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZg.ttf
103 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfMZg.ttf
107 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf
118 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf
118 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZg.ttf
117 ms
themify.woff@-fvbane
593 ms
Flaticon.svg
94 ms
Flaticon.woff
522 ms
js
38 ms
embed
300 ms
medi-icon.png
15 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
305 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
234 ms
js
23 ms
search.js
4 ms
geometry.js
7 ms
main.js
13 ms
electronicmedicalrecords-emr.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
electronicmedicalrecords-emr.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
electronicmedicalrecords-emr.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Electronicmedicalrecords-emr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Electronicmedicalrecords-emr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
electronicmedicalrecords-emr.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Electronicmedicalrecords Emr. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: