5.1 sec in total
1.8 sec
3 sec
313 ms
Visit elegancelab.com now to see the best up-to-date Elegancelab content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about elegancelab.com
Visit elegancelab.comWe analyzed Elegancelab.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
elegancelab.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value3.7 s
59/100
25%
Value3.4 s
90/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.099
90/100
15%
Value3.9 s
89/100
10%
1789 ms
89 ms
107 ms
110 ms
101 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Elegancelab.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Elegancelab.com.
Page size can be reduced by 675.8 kB (26%)
2.6 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Elegancelab.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.3 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 288.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Elegancelab needs image optimization as it can save up to 288.8 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 198.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 198.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 157.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Elegancelab.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 157.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (48%)
62
32
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Elegancelab. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
elegancelab.com
1789 ms
css-front.css
89 ms
ajax-load-more.css
107 ms
styles.css
110 ms
otw-portfolio.css
101 ms
responsiveslides.css
108 ms
css
25 ms
genericons.css
137 ms
style.css
148 ms
style.css
152 ms
wp-about-author.css
189 ms
jquery.js
257 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
192 ms
responsiveslides.min.js
190 ms
google_analytics_auto.js
196 ms
style.css
177 ms
flexslider.css
223 ms
flexslider.css
221 ms
ajax-load-more.js
231 ms
jquery.form.min.js
225 ms
scripts.js
277 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
276 ms
masonry.min.js
318 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
293 ms
functions.js
294 ms
jquery.ui.effect.min.js
305 ms
jquery.animate-shadow-min.js
335 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
333 ms
flexslider-customjs.js
357 ms
otw-portfolio.js
343 ms
jquery.quicksand.js
376 ms
layout.css
315 ms
ga.js
55 ms
srch-btn.png
125 ms
header-bg.png
110 ms
logo.png
130 ms
menu-bg.png
132 ms
menu-sep.png
124 ms
submenu-top-arrow.png
109 ms
banner-brdr.png
171 ms
banner-bg.png
179 ms
banner-1.png
393 ms
banner-2.png
374 ms
banner-3.png
599 ms
banner-4.png
518 ms
portfolio-nav-sep.png
234 ms
thumbnail21-244x188.jpg
287 ms
white-overlay.png
290 ms
thumbnail20-244x188.jpg
487 ms
thumbnail19-244x188.jpg
421 ms
thumbnail18-244x188.jpg
486 ms
thumbnail17-244x188.jpg
511 ms
thumbnail16-244x188.jpg
554 ms
thumbnail15-244x188.jpg
562 ms
thumbnail14-244x188.jpg
590 ms
footer-brdr-trans.png
575 ms
expertise-bg.png
620 ms
mobile-ico.png
623 ms
mail-ico.png
620 ms
skype-ico.png
666 ms
navigate-ico.png
635 ms
OpenSans-Regular.woff
670 ms
DancingScript-Regular.woff
671 ms
fontello.woff
648 ms
WyXtbLelkv62W9rJf1sl7ohV7ohV7ohV7ohV7ohV7RK3pFr+gVvaJX9Ipe0St6tV6tV+vVerVerVfr1Xq1Xq3X6DV6jV7T9Yr3qXifivepdPIfY1AvlQABUnNepwAA
25 ms
__utm.gif
59 ms
ajax-loader.gif
567 ms
elegancelab.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
elegancelab.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
elegancelab.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Elegancelab.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Elegancelab.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
elegancelab.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Elegancelab. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: