Tools & Wizards About Us
elegantelight.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

elegantelight.com

Home » Elegant Light Studio – Anchorage Alaska Wedding & Family Photographer

Page Load Speed

13.8 sec in total

First Response

2.2 sec

Resources Loaded

10 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

elegantelight.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Elegant E Light content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about elegantelight.com

Capturing true-to-life moments with color & crisp character. Alaska Wedding and Family Photographer with a studio based in Anchorage.

Visit elegantelight.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Elegantelight.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 11.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

elegantelight.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

elegantlightstudio.com

2219 ms

js

385 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

371 ms

bamboo-columns.css

441 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

418 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Elegantelight.com, 28% (19 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 13% (9 requests) were made to C0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (23%)

Content Size

7.6 MB

After Optimization

5.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Elegantelight.com main page is 7.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 123.6 kB

  • Original 148.7 kB
  • After minification 148.7 kB
  • After compression 25.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 1.6 MB

  • Original 7.3 MB
  • After minification 5.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Elegant E Light needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 60.6 kB
  • After minification 60.6 kB
  • After compression 58.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 15.7 kB

  • Original 78.0 kB
  • After minification 78.0 kB
  • After compression 62.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Elegantelight.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.7 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (64%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Elegant E Light. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

elegantlightstudio.com

elegantlightstudio.com

2219 ms

js

js

385 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

371 ms

bamboo-columns.css

bamboo-columns.css

441 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

418 ms

post-2772.css

post-2772.css

447 ms

e-gallery.min.css

e-gallery.min.css

415 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

cookie-law-info-public.css

414 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

670 ms

style.css

style.css

693 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

689 ms

post-2079.css

post-2079.css

666 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

712 ms

global.css

global.css

696 ms

css

css

446 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

995 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

894 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

923 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

441 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

472 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

440 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

925 ms

cookie-law-info-public.js

cookie-law-info-public.js

960 ms

tasty-pinit.build.js

tasty-pinit.build.js

921 ms

cookie-law-info-table.css

cookie-law-info-table.css

1430 ms

e-gallery.min.js

e-gallery.min.js

1440 ms

photon.min.js

photon.min.js

448 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

1429 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1439 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1438 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

401 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

400 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

447 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

447 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1422 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1644 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

445 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1641 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

1648 ms

e-202240.js

e-202240.js

446 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

371 ms

Elegant-Light-Studio-Website-Updated-0914.png

Elegant-Light-Studio-Website-Updated-0914.png

913 ms

20180621-Jeffrey-Mai-Wedding-3938-180-Elegante-Light-Photography-907-782-4882-Elegant-Light-Studio-907-252-4424.jpg

20180621-Jeffrey-Mai-Wedding-3938-180-Elegante-Light-Photography-907-782-4882-Elegant-Light-Studio-907-252-4424.jpg

863 ms

Copy-of-Solvera-Tech-Website-3-copy-4.png

Copy-of-Solvera-Tech-Website-3-copy-4.png

892 ms

2-1.png

2-1.png

771 ms

Copy-of-Solvera-Tech-Website.png

Copy-of-Solvera-Tech-Website.png

1306 ms

ABOUT-2.png

ABOUT-2.png

754 ms

WEDDINGS.png

WEDDINGS.png

755 ms

BLOG-1.png

BLOG-1.png

728 ms

CONTACT.png

CONTACT.png

501 ms

20180728-Whitney-Nick-Wedding-0053-9297-Elegante-Light-Photography-907-782-4882-Elegant-Light-Studio-907-252-4424.jpg

20180728-Whitney-Nick-Wedding-0053-9297-Elegante-Light-Photography-907-782-4882-Elegant-Light-Studio-907-252-4424.jpg

1154 ms

20180728-Whitney-Nick-Wedding-0034-8241-Elegante-Light-Photography-907-782-4882-Elegant-Light-Studio-907-252-4424.jpg

20180728-Whitney-Nick-Wedding-0034-8241-Elegante-Light-Photography-907-782-4882-Elegant-Light-Studio-907-252-4424.jpg

639 ms

Logos.png

Logos.png

1663 ms

Untitled-700-%C3%97-800-px-800-%C3%97-700-px-1.png

Untitled-700-%C3%97-800-px-800-%C3%97-700-px-1.png

2254 ms

2.png

2.png

3516 ms

Sharon-Carter-Wedding-Photographer-Elegant-Light-Studio-907-252-4424.jpg

Sharon-Carter-Wedding-Photographer-Elegant-Light-Studio-907-252-4424.jpg

1240 ms

Wedding-Album-9478-Elegant-Light-Studio-907-252-4424.jpg

Wedding-Album-9478-Elegant-Light-Studio-907-252-4424.jpg

1340 ms

Wedding-Album-9470-Elegant-Light-Studio-907-252-4424.jpg

Wedding-Album-9470-Elegant-Light-Studio-907-252-4424.jpg

1609 ms

Wedding-Album-9471-Elegant-Light-Studio-907-252-4424.jpg

Wedding-Album-9471-Elegant-Light-Studio-907-252-4424.jpg

1701 ms

ABOUT-1.png

ABOUT-1.png

1426 ms

BLOG.png

BLOG.png

1540 ms

INSTAGRAM-1.png

INSTAGRAM-1.png

2468 ms

FACEBOOK-1.png

FACEBOOK-1.png

2433 ms

PINTEREST-1.png

PINTEREST-1.png

1743 ms

Ogg-Medium.ttf

Ogg-Medium.ttf

771 ms

BonVivant.ttf

BonVivant.ttf

1149 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

929 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1099 ms

1771190183094744

1771190183094744

148 ms

SEO Factors

elegantelight.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Elegantelight.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Elegantelight.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

elegantelight.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Elegant E Light. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: