8.6 sec in total
331 ms
8.1 sec
182 ms
Visit eloerp.net now to see the best up-to-date EloERP content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eloerp.net
Visit eloerp.netWe analyzed Eloerp.net page load time and found that the first response time was 331 ms and then it took 8.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
eloerp.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value21.1 s
0/100
10%
Value35.1 s
0/100
25%
Value25.1 s
0/100
10%
Value620 ms
48/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value32.7 s
0/100
10%
331 ms
4357 ms
167 ms
218 ms
518 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (94 requests) were addressed to the original Eloerp.net, 3% (3 requests) were made to Client.crisp.chat and 2% (2 requests) were made to Assets.calendly.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Eloerp.net.
Page size can be reduced by 4.8 MB (81%)
6.0 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Eloerp.net main page is 6.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 326.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 50.8 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 326.6 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.5 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, EloERP needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 81% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 776.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 776.6 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eloerp.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.2 MB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (69%)
97
30
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EloERP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eloerp.net
331 ms
eloerp.net
4357 ms
widget.css
167 ms
widget.js
218 ms
style.min.css
518 ms
css
25 ms
style.min.css
477 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
382 ms
owl.carousel.css
300 ms
font-awesome.min.css
396 ms
tcls.css
402 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
429 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
476 ms
frontend.min.css
665 ms
swiper.min.css
499 ms
post-3826.css
503 ms
frontend.min.css
811 ms
uael-frontend.min.css
1040 ms
all.min.css
686 ms
v4-shims.min.css
602 ms
global.css
897 ms
post-2358.css
705 ms
post-117.css
763 ms
style.min.css
789 ms
post-54.css
822 ms
ekiticons.css
955 ms
widget-styles.css
1188 ms
responsive.css
909 ms
general.min.css
915 ms
css
13 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1000 ms
solid.min.css
1008 ms
brands.min.css
1017 ms
jquery.min.js
1060 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1102 ms
v4-shims.min.js
1105 ms
post-3349.css
638 ms
post-3359.css
657 ms
animations.min.css
671 ms
regular.min.css
919 ms
style.min.js
919 ms
l.js
316 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
920 ms
happy-addons.min.js
920 ms
frontend-script.js
920 ms
widget-scripts.js
921 ms
general.min.js
922 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
922 ms
jquery.datatables.min.js
1100 ms
uael-table.min.js
922 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
923 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
910 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1082 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
982 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
919 ms
hooks.min.js
899 ms
i18n.min.js
881 ms
frontend.min.js
825 ms
waypoints.min.js
797 ms
core.min.js
768 ms
swiper.min.js
767 ms
share-link.min.js
690 ms
dialog.min.js
767 ms
frontend.min.js
763 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
923 ms
animate-circle.js
675 ms
elementor.js
670 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
661 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
822 ms
logo-header.min.svg
520 ms
eloerp-cloud.png
578 ms
eloerp-hero.png
580 ms
customer-1.png
579 ms
inventory.png
577 ms
retail-store1.png
582 ms
Fashion-and-Boutique1.png
580 ms
Shoe-Store1.png
483 ms
Book-Store1.png
483 ms
Appliances1.png
483 ms
restaurant-and-Bar1.png
565 ms
distribution..png
565 ms
ALL.png
565 ms
process-1.jpg
565 ms
retail3.png
701 ms
retail2.png
566 ms
Stock-Report-new.jpg
697 ms
purchase-prcoess.jpg
697 ms
Sale-Invoice-1-new.jpg
523 ms
EloERP-Point-of-sale.png
522 ms
phone.png
522 ms
chat.png
554 ms
erp-logo-white.png
670 ms
features_icons.png
670 ms
Industries_icons.png
670 ms
plus-icon.png
670 ms
pricing2_icons.png
670 ms
demo_icons.png
669 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
205 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
579 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
658 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
658 ms
client.js
20 ms
client_default.css
30 ms
eloerp.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
eloerp.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
eloerp.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eloerp.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eloerp.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eloerp.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EloERP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: