3.1 sec in total
568 ms
2.3 sec
263 ms
Welcome to em.no homepage info - get ready to check Em best content right away, or after learning these important things about em.no
Elektriker i Oslo og Akershus? Utfører alle typer elektrikeroppdrag, alt fra små til store prosjekter. Leverer kun produkter fra kjente kvalitetsmerker. >>
Visit em.noWe analyzed Em.no page load time and found that the first response time was 568 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
em.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value11.5 s
0/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value10,450 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.5 s
2/100
10%
568 ms
100 ms
191 ms
193 ms
193 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Em.no, 5% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (755 ms) belongs to the original domain Em.no.
Page size can be reduced by 921.8 kB (49%)
1.9 MB
977.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Em.no main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Em images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 766.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 766.6 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 88.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Em.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 88.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (65%)
74
26
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Em. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
em.no
568 ms
style.css
100 ms
responsive.css
191 ms
styles.css
193 ms
social_widget.css
193 ms
blue.css
203 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
319 ms
modernizr.custom.js
208 ms
ddlevelsmenu.js
286 ms
ddlevelsmenu-invoke.js
284 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
287 ms
js
48 ms
jquery.form.min.js
308 ms
scripts.js
377 ms
ie.js
376 ms
form-processor.js
380 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
400 ms
jquery.polyglot.language.switcher.js
411 ms
tinynav.min.js
416 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
472 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
471 ms
jquery.ui.totop.min.js
474 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.0.custom.min.js
723 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
516 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
523 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
663 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
566 ms
jquery.tweet.js
570 ms
jflickrfeed.min.js
618 ms
jquery.quicksand.js
625 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
660 ms
jquery.gmap.min.js
667 ms
comment-reply.min.js
721 ms
custom.js
732 ms
wp-embed.min.js
755 ms
css
24 ms
css
36 ms
css
45 ms
html5-reset.css
671 ms
polyglot-language-switcher.css
672 ms
flexslider.css
729 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
645 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
658 ms
shortcodes.css
670 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
126 ms
j.php
15 ms
em__logo.png
128 ms
facebook.png
132 ms
googleplus.png
132 ms
linkedin.png
133 ms
utelys-940x350.jpg
297 ms
utstilling-940x350.jpg
328 ms
damekjokken-940x350.jpg
471 ms
nobo-940x350.jpg
302 ms
majorstua-940x350.jpg
425 ms
Fridom1-940x350.jpg
425 ms
fastelektriker.png
377 ms
pdf-logo.png
401 ms
Elkobanner600x260.jpg
419 ms
gtm.js
62 ms
v.gif
3 ms
home.png
457 ms
phone.png
487 ms
fax.png
499 ms
mail.png
512 ms
clock.png
511 ms
farmer.png
690 ms
common.js
48 ms
util.js
52 ms
geocoder.js
48 ms
arrows.png
447 ms
scroll-top.png
484 ms
analytics.js
40 ms
collect
4 ms
collect
68 ms
ga-audiences
34 ms
em.no accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
em.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
em.no SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
NO
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Em.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Em.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
em.no
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Em. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: