935 ms in total
61 ms
484 ms
390 ms
Welcome to ema2.com homepage info - get ready to check Ema 2 best content right away, or after learning these important things about ema2.com
Visit ema2.comWe analyzed Ema2.com page load time and found that the first response time was 61 ms and then it took 874 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
ema2.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
75/100
10%
Value9.7 s
0/100
25%
Value4.4 s
73/100
10%
Value150 ms
95/100
30%
Value0.394
26/100
15%
Value7.3 s
50/100
10%
61 ms
44 ms
60 ms
64 ms
64 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Ema2.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (265 ms) belongs to the original domain Ema2.com.
Page size can be reduced by 63.5 kB (6%)
1.1 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Ema2.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 972.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 897 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ema 2 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 15.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 15.8 kB or 19% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ema2.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.9 kB or 29% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (58%)
45
19
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ema 2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ema2.com
61 ms
css
44 ms
css
60 ms
css
64 ms
css
64 ms
style.css
27 ms
style.min.css
70 ms
styles.css
50 ms
superfish.css
48 ms
flexslider.css
51 ms
tt_shortcode.css
56 ms
flexslider.css
56 ms
jquery.min.js
95 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
76 ms
js
74 ms
comment-reply.min.js
74 ms
jquery.pageslide.min.js
80 ms
superfish.js
79 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
92 ms
jquery.actual.min.js
153 ms
jquery.fittext.js
154 ms
jquery.waitforimages.min.js
155 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
156 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
211 ms
theme_trust.js
211 ms
bootstrap.min.js
212 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
216 ms
jquery.waitforimages.min.js
212 ms
tt_sc_functions.js
265 ms
banner-orig.jpg
220 ms
ema-logo.png
151 ms
menu.gif
150 ms
white-marble-background-3.jpg
215 ms
gold-c.svg
152 ms
silver-c.svg
153 ms
bitcoin-c.svg
155 ms
producers-c.svg
159 ms
developers-c.svg
157 ms
drill-stories-c.svg
161 ms
chart1-1_thumb.png
163 ms
chart2-2_thumb.png
162 ms
chart3-1_thumb.png
163 ms
chart4-1_thumb.png
164 ms
chart5-1_thumb.png
164 ms
chart6-1_thumb.png
164 ms
direction_nav.png
67 ms
va9E4kDNxMZdWfMOD5Vvl4jN.woff
21 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnLK3eRhf8.woff
25 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
64 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
65 ms
va9C4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VvkrjJYTQ.woff
64 ms
va9f4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VvkrByRCf4VF8.woff
65 ms
flexslider-icon.woff
48 ms
ema2.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ema2.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ema2.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ema2.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ema2.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ema2.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ema 2. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: