4.5 sec in total
327 ms
3.4 sec
705 ms
Visit email-vergleich.com now to see the best up-to-date E Mail Vergleich content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about email-vergleich.com
Vergleiche und Tests sämtlicher E-Mail Anbieter bzw. E-Mail Provider inklusive News und Trends. Hier findet man die passende neue Adresse.
Visit email-vergleich.comWe analyzed Email-vergleich.com page load time and found that the first response time was 327 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
email-vergleich.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value2.9 s
80/100
25%
Value7.0 s
32/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.9 s
96/100
10%
327 ms
1135 ms
401 ms
301 ms
207 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Email-vergleich.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Email-vergleich.com.
Page size can be reduced by 205.2 kB (54%)
382.5 kB
177.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Email-vergleich.com main page is 382.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 190.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. E Mail Vergleich images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 118.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 118.7 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Email-vergleich.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (73%)
37
10
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Mail Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
email-vergleich.com
327 ms
www.email-vergleich.com
1135 ms
style.css
401 ms
dbx.js
301 ms
dbx-key.js
207 ms
dbx.css
207 ms
widget.css
204 ms
polls-css.css
304 ms
jquery.js
812 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
310 ms
external-tracking.min.js
308 ms
swfobject.js
413 ms
plugin.css
413 ms
datatables.css
414 ms
polls-js.js
215 ms
wp-embed.min.js
302 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
205 ms
ga.js
320 ms
back-gradient.png
302 ms
sheen.png
302 ms
navgrad-normal.png
301 ms
home-icon-trans.png
299 ms
form-field-bg.gif
300 ms
search-button.png
299 ms
calendar.gif
301 ms
s2s-tls-three.png
302 ms
Screen-shot-2014-07-15-at-12.12.42-PM1.png
444 ms
dnssec_tlsa_validator.png
303 ms
agradient-30.gif
301 ms
navigation-left.gif
300 ms
pagelines-sig.png
320 ms
folder.png
320 ms
calendar_view_month.png
321 ms
bullet_black.png
338 ms
feed.png
341 ms
navgrad-active.gif
705 ms
navgrad-down.gif
1086 ms
navgrad-hover.gif
695 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
print.css
105 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
sidebar-toggle.gif
105 ms
email-vergleich.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
email-vergleich.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
email-vergleich.com SEO score
DE
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Email-vergleich.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Email-vergleich.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
email-vergleich.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of E Mail Vergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: