Tools & Wizards About Us
emailmarketingtree.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

emailmarketingtree.com

種類で異なる仕事内容

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

736 ms

Resources Loaded

5 sec

Page Rendered

81 ms

emailmarketingtree.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Emailmarketingtree content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about emailmarketingtree.com

高齢化が進む社会の中で、介護の仕事はますます需要が高まっている。特別養護老人ホームや有料老人ホームでの仕事は食事や入浴の介助といった生活支援からレクリエーションの運営まで、介護職員の仕事は多岐に渡っている。

Visit emailmarketingtree.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Emailmarketingtree.com page load time and found that the first response time was 736 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

emailmarketingtree.com performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.2 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.4 s

72/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

emailmarketingtree.com

736 ms

www.emailmarketingtree.com

2802 ms

category-to-pages-wud.css

405 ms

jquery.ctp_wud.css

386 ms

style.min.css

951 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Emailmarketingtree.com, 49% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Emailmarketingtree.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 330.4 kB (77%)

Content Size

428.0 kB

After Optimization

97.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Emailmarketingtree.com main page is 428.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 219.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 24.8 kB

  • Original 32.8 kB
  • After minification 31.3 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 149 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Emailmarketingtree needs image optimization as it can save up to 149 B or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 119.0 kB

  • Original 174.4 kB
  • After minification 174.1 kB
  • After compression 55.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 119.0 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 186.4 kB

  • Original 219.6 kB
  • After minification 193.3 kB
  • After compression 33.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emailmarketingtree.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 186.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (84%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Emailmarketingtree. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

emailmarketingtree.com

emailmarketingtree.com

736 ms

www.emailmarketingtree.com

www.emailmarketingtree.com

2802 ms

category-to-pages-wud.css

category-to-pages-wud.css

405 ms

jquery.ctp_wud.css

jquery.ctp_wud.css

386 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

951 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

512 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

395 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

511 ms

jquery.sidr.light.min.css

jquery.sidr.light.min.css

527 ms

css

css

21 ms

style.css

style.css

939 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1213 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

840 ms

cat-to-page.js

cat-to-page.js

659 ms

jquery.ctp_wud_min.js

jquery.ctp_wud_min.js

677 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1331 ms

jquery.sidr.min.js

jquery.sidr.min.js

986 ms

waypoint.min.js

waypoint.min.js

1093 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

1092 ms

custom.min.js

custom.min.js

1493 ms

search-icon2.png

search-icon2.png

452 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWCWtFCc.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWCWtFCc.woff

7 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWCWtFCfQ7A.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWCWtFCfQ7A.woff

9 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw3q5d0.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw3q5d0.woff

21 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw3q5d0N7w.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw3q5d0N7w.woff

19 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw3q5d0.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw3q5d0.woff

20 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw3q5d0N7w.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw3q5d0N7w.woff

19 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

20 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-AMP6lbBP.woff

21 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

22 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBxc-AMP6lbBP.woff

20 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCBc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCBc-AMP6lbBP.woff

22 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfABc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfABc-AMP6lbBP.woff

21 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCRc-AMP6lbBP.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCRc-AMP6lbBP.woff

22 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

23 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

23 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7WxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7WxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

25 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4WxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4WxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

24 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7mxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7mxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

25 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxMKTU1Kvnz.woff

25 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu72xMKTU1Kvnz.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu72xMKTU1Kvnz.woff

26 ms

Accessibility Review

emailmarketingtree.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

emailmarketingtree.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

emailmarketingtree.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emailmarketingtree.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Emailmarketingtree.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

emailmarketingtree.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: