Tools & Wizards About Us
emartee.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 44

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

emartee.com

Emartee.Electronics

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

144 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

139 ms

emartee.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Emartee content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about emartee.com

Emartee.Electronics

Visit emartee.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Emartee.com page load time and found that the first response time was 144 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

emartee.com performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

71/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.04

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.0 s

87/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

emartee.com

144 ms

emartee.com

343 ms

e.css

64 ms

emartee.css

129 ms

prototype.js

241 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Emartee.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (488 ms) belongs to the original domain Emartee.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 114.6 kB (18%)

Content Size

619.7 kB

After Optimization

505.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Emartee.com main page is 619.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 492.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 36.0 kB

  • Original 44.0 kB
  • After minification 38.8 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.2 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 60.2 kB

  • Original 492.0 kB
  • After minification 431.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Emartee needs image optimization as it can save up to 60.2 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 10.4 kB

  • Original 63.1 kB
  • After minification 62.8 kB
  • After compression 52.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 10.4 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 20.5 kB
  • After minification 20.5 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emartee.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.0 kB or 39% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (13%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

49

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Emartee. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

emartee.com

emartee.com

144 ms

emartee.com

emartee.com

343 ms

e.css

e.css

64 ms

emartee.css

emartee.css

129 ms

prototype.js

prototype.js

241 ms

scriptaculous.js

scriptaculous.js

182 ms

LAPJS2.20.js

LAPJS2.20.js

186 ms

public01.css

public01.css

63 ms

flyout.css

flyout.css

152 ms

effects.js

effects.js

65 ms

newheaderbg01.jpg

newheaderbg01.jpg

123 ms

newmenubg.jpg

newmenubg.jpg

121 ms

newmenu01.jpg

newmenu01.jpg

63 ms

newmenu02.jpg

newmenu02.jpg

123 ms

newmenu03.jpg

newmenu03.jpg

191 ms

newmenu04.jpg

newmenu04.jpg

142 ms

newmenu05.jpg

newmenu05.jpg

232 ms

newmenu06.jpg

newmenu06.jpg

182 ms

newsearchbg.gif

newsearchbg.gif

183 ms

searchbuton.jpg

searchbuton.jpg

184 ms

Proxmark3.jpg

Proxmark3.jpg

203 ms

voice.jpg

voice.jpg

244 ms

International%20shipping(3).jpg

International%20shipping(3).jpg

247 ms

42293.jpg

42293.jpg

247 ms

42282.jpg

42282.jpg

252 ms

42277.jpg

42277.jpg

264 ms

41887.jpg

41887.jpg

291 ms

42302.jpg

42302.jpg

305 ms

42291.jpg

42291.jpg

308 ms

42272.jpg

42272.jpg

309 ms

42306.jpg

42306.jpg

312 ms

China%20Post.jpg

China%20Post.jpg

325 ms

ems(1).jpg

ems(1).jpg

352 ms

dhl_logo(2).jpg

dhl_logo(2).jpg

365 ms

ups_logo(1).jpg

ups_logo(1).jpg

369 ms

paypal(5).jpg

paypal(5).jpg

369 ms

42044.jpg

42044.jpg

373 ms

41424.jpg

41424.jpg

387 ms

41525.jpg

41525.jpg

413 ms

41824.jpg

41824.jpg

428 ms

41451.jpg

41451.jpg

429 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

430 ms

footlog.gif

footlog.gif

433 ms

footmidhre.gif

footmidhre.gif

439 ms

ga.js

ga.js

16 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

foottop.gif

foottop.gif

416 ms

error

error

470 ms

error

error

488 ms

newproducttitlebg.jpg

newproducttitlebg.jpg

375 ms

newfeattitlebg.jpg

newfeattitlebg.jpg

379 ms

btn_03.gif

btn_03.gif

389 ms

newboardbg.jpg

newboardbg.jpg

399 ms

newhostbg.jpg

newhostbg.jpg

376 ms

categbg.jpg

categbg.jpg

380 ms

newcatnew01.png

newcatnew01.png

388 ms

mailtitlebg.jpg

mailtitlebg.jpg

417 ms

newjoinbg.jpg

newjoinbg.jpg

398 ms

Accessibility Review

emartee.com accessibility score

44

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

emartee.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

emartee.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emartee.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Emartee.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

emartee.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Emartee. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: