1.6 sec in total
63 ms
1.1 sec
420 ms
Welcome to emmatt.com homepage info - get ready to check Emmatt best content right away, or after learning these important things about emmatt.com
Best full-service website design and web development. Custom programming, digital marketing, SEO Services. Proudly operating since 1998 in Peterborough.
Visit emmatt.comWe analyzed Emmatt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 63 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
emmatt.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value11.9 s
0/100
25%
Value10.7 s
7/100
10%
Value3,370 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.093
91/100
15%
Value14.2 s
9/100
10%
63 ms
41 ms
15 ms
26 ms
114 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Emmatt.com, 15% (11 requests) were made to Emmattweb.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (360 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 215.9 kB (78%)
277.2 kB
61.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Emmatt.com main page is 277.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 253.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 215.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 215.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 102 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 82 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emmatt.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (67%)
18
6
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Emmatt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
emmattweb.com
63 ms
font-awesome.min.css
41 ms
4c431.css
15 ms
99fcc.css
26 ms
js
114 ms
49c40.js
23 ms
f5135.js
88 ms
cd47b.js
31 ms
cd264.js
121 ms
api.js
139 ms
31730.js
31 ms
2a6b9.js
30 ms
1dbd5.js
31 ms
fbevents.js
102 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1g.woff
75 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf
178 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJM.woff
196 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf
198 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1g.woff
194 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf
198 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1g.woff
196 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf
201 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedA.woff
330 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedw.ttf
332 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1g.woff
333 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf
336 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1g.woff
335 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf
335 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1g.woff
336 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf
338 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1g.woff
337 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1s.ttf
342 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w9.woff
340 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf
343 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w9.woff
339 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf
341 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w9.woff
342 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-.ttf
343 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w9.woff
344 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf
349 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew9.woff
346 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf
348 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9.woff
346 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf
343 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew9.woff
345 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf
360 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew9.woff
352 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew-.ttf
351 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw9.woff
351 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw-.ttf
353 ms
analytics.js
54 ms
recaptcha__en.js
153 ms
2434818973462708
121 ms
collect
31 ms
modules.ttf
159 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6aXw.woff
185 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6aX8.ttf
171 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6aXw.woff
166 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6aX8.ttf
166 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR6aXw.woff
164 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR6aX8.ttf
164 ms
collect
296 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqw16aXw.woff
163 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqw16aX8.ttf
106 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9aXw.woff
162 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9aX8.ttf
161 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9aXw.woff
309 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9aX8.ttf
331 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9aXw.woff
158 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9aX8.ttf
158 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR9aXw.woff
158 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR9aX8.ttf
349 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R8aXw.woff
159 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R8aX8.ttf
157 ms
emmatt.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
emmatt.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
emmatt.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emmatt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Emmatt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
emmatt.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Emmatt. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: