1.9 sec in total
108 ms
1.7 sec
56 ms
Welcome to emsol.in homepage info - get ready to check Emsol best content right away, or after learning these important things about emsol.in
Visit emsol.inWe analyzed Emsol.in page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
emsol.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value6.7 s
8/100
25%
Value3.9 s
82/100
10%
Value820 ms
36/100
30%
Value0.031
100/100
15%
Value12.6 s
14/100
10%
108 ms
48 ms
107 ms
40 ms
141 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Emsol.in, 36% (17 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 30% (14 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 640.3 kB (58%)
1.1 MB
459.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Emsol.in main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 757.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 633.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 633.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Emsol images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (35%)
34
22
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Emsol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.emsol.in
108 ms
minified.js
48 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
107 ms
polyfill.min.js
40 ms
8875.e26292eb.bundle.min.js
141 ms
thunderbolt-commons.b7a35b00.bundle.min.js
139 ms
main.d98de0fd.bundle.min.js
155 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
154 ms
lodash.min.js
153 ms
react.production.min.js
136 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
173 ms
browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js
173 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
172 ms
Emsol%20Logo%20-%20Leaf%20Only%20(White).png
278 ms
bundle.min.js
132 ms
c837a6_b7cc99c9094f4459880ca462b8521bf8~mv2.webp
293 ms
c837a6_b7cc99c9094f4459880ca462b8521bf8~mv2.webp
259 ms
c837a6_875538c2920a4f68bd37ae4273296bad~mv2.webp
261 ms
c837a6_875538c2920a4f68bd37ae4273296bad~mv2.webp
262 ms
WELCOME.jpg
405 ms
chuttersnap-znOg3WpLSsY-unsplash.jpg
441 ms
11062b_caf2e0a7cfa741bd9d7686984c40af25f001.jpg
525 ms
1000.jpg
396 ms
006%20(2).jpg
746 ms
3000.jpg
600 ms
2000.jpg
690 ms
shutterstock_723103753.jpg
697 ms
Image%20by%20David%20Martin.jpg
673 ms
Image%20by%20Zia%20Syed.jpg
1344 ms
istockphoto-1184453612-612x612.jpg
787 ms
MicrosoftTeams-image%20(1).png
868 ms
133 ms
136 ms
131 ms
131 ms
129 ms
125 ms
158 ms
164 ms
155 ms
159 ms
155 ms
147 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
24 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
8 ms
right-arrow.svg
8 ms
emsol.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
emsol.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
emsol.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emsol.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Emsol.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
emsol.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Emsol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: