Tools & Wizards About Us
energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net

Energieleveranciers vergelijken? Bespaar tot € 700 per jaar!

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

329 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

241 ms

energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net screenshot

About Website

Visit energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net now to see the best up-to-date Energieleveranciers Vergelijken content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net

lll➤ Energieleveranciers Vergelijken ? ?lle Energieleveranciers Vergelijken op ➥ Groen/ Grijs ➥ Prijs ➥ Looptijd ✚ N? Energieleveranciers Vergelijken!

Visit energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net page load time and found that the first response time was 329 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

91/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.0 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,240 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.165

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.8 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net

329 ms

www.energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net

317 ms

style.css

108 ms

logo.png

275 ms

menui.png

178 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net, 63% (30 requests) were made to Partners.easyswitch.nl and 4% (2 requests) were made to Easyswitch.nl. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (801 ms) relates to the external source Partners.easyswitch.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 230.2 kB (64%)

Content Size

358.5 kB

After Optimization

128.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net main page is 358.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 180.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 7.5 kB
  • After minification 7.2 kB
  • After compression 2.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.3 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 41.3 kB
  • After minification 25.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Energieleveranciers Vergelijken needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 99.4 kB

  • Original 180.1 kB
  • After minification 162.4 kB
  • After compression 80.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 99.4 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 110.0 kB

  • Original 129.6 kB
  • After minification 100.4 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 110.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (63%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Energieleveranciers Vergelijken. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net

energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net

329 ms

www.energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net

www.energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net

317 ms

style.css

style.css

108 ms

logo.png

logo.png

275 ms

menui.png

menui.png

178 ms

iframe.js

iframe.js

354 ms

widget-overstappers.php

widget-overstappers.php

528 ms

vergelijk-energie

vergelijk-energie

801 ms

widget-overstappers.css

widget-overstappers.css

83 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

171 ms

comparison.js

comparison.js

244 ms

validate.js

validate.js

248 ms

system.css

system.css

248 ms

general.css

general.css

250 ms

template.css

template.css

356 ms

common.js

common.js

268 ms

informationPopup.js

informationPopup.js

326 ms

homepage_showMenu.js

homepage_showMenu.js

328 ms

custom.css

custom.css

428 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

31 ms

main.css

main.css

84 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

93 ms

overstappen-logo.png

overstappen-logo.png

92 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

70 ms

breadcrumb_round_left.png

breadcrumb_round_left.png

104 ms

breadcrumb_round_right.png

breadcrumb_round_right.png

103 ms

breadcrumb_divider.png

breadcrumb_divider.png

102 ms

corner_round_topleft.png

corner_round_topleft.png

96 ms

corner_round_topright.png

corner_round_topright.png

144 ms

learn-more.png

learn-more.png

145 ms

input-gradient.png

input-gradient.png

178 ms

man_1.png

man_1.png

187 ms

man_2.png

man_2.png

181 ms

man_3.png

man_3.png

188 ms

man_4.png

man_4.png

224 ms

man_5.png

man_5.png

232 ms

man_x.png

man_x.png

257 ms

button_40px_round_left.png

button_40px_round_left.png

262 ms

button_40px_round_right.png

button_40px_round_right.png

276 ms

dot.png

dot.png

276 ms

18 ms

61 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

84 ms

48 ms

collect

collect

27 ms

collect

collect

59 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

16 ms

nr-885.min.js

nr-885.min.js

43 ms

Accessibility Review

energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

energieleveranciers-vergelijken.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Energieleveranciers Vergelijken. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: