23.9 sec in total
1.9 sec
22 sec
84 ms
Visit energievergelijken.info now to see the best up-to-date Energie Vergelijken content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about energievergelijken.info
Het vergelijken van energie via energievergelijken.info is erg eenvoudig. Je voert je postcode en huisnummer in en je kunt beginnen met vergelijken.
Visit energievergelijken.infoWe analyzed Energievergelijken.info page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 22.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
energievergelijken.info performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
12/100
10%
Value4.8 s
31/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value320 ms
76/100
30%
Value0.051
99/100
15%
Value6.2 s
62/100
10%
1890 ms
1023 ms
102 ms
198 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Energievergelijken.info, 23% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Energievergelijken.info.
Page size can be reduced by 26.6 kB (10%)
254.4 kB
227.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Energievergelijken.info main page is 254.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 116.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 315 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Energie Vergelijken needs image optimization as it can save up to 315 B or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 900 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 114 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Energievergelijken.info has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (79%)
14
3
The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Energie Vergelijken. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
energievergelijken.info
1890 ms
www.energievergelijken.info
1023 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
102 ms
styles.css
198 ms
css
33 ms
style.css
488 ms
dashicons.min.css
379 ms
jquery.js
384 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
285 ms
et-divi-customizer-global-17156798102886.min.css
282 ms
scripts.js
290 ms
comment-reply.min.js
379 ms
custom.min.js
584 ms
common.js
387 ms
wp-embed.min.js
472 ms
logo.png
117 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
19 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
82 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
94 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
101 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
102 ms
modules.ttf
106 ms
energievergelijken.info accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
energievergelijken.info best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
energievergelijken.info SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
NL
NL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Energievergelijken.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Energievergelijken.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
energievergelijken.info
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: