Report Summary

  • 6

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

enfielddoors.co.uk

Bespoke Fire Doors from UK Manufacturer Enfield Doors

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

528 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

508 ms

enfielddoors.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to enfielddoors.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Enfield Doors best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about enfielddoors.co.uk

Fire doors manufactured in the UK by Enfield Doors. We supply bespoke fire doors made to exact specifications at competitive prices. Order your fire door today.

Visit enfielddoors.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Enfielddoors.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 528 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

enfielddoors.co.uk performance score

6

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.2 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,850 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.722

6/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.3 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.enfielddoors.co.uk

528 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

164 ms

jquery.plupload.queue.css

246 ms

tooltipster.css

266 ms

jquery.countdown.css

269 ms

Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (91 requests) were addressed to the original Enfielddoors.co.uk, 4% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (968 ms) belongs to the original domain Enfielddoors.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 478.0 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Enfielddoors.co.uk main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 912.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 89.8 kB

  • Original 109.9 kB
  • After minification 99.6 kB
  • After compression 20.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 263.4 kB

  • Original 912.4 kB
  • After minification 648.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Enfield Doors needs image optimization as it can save up to 263.4 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 124.7 kB

  • Original 513.9 kB
  • After minification 513.8 kB
  • After compression 389.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 124.7 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (67%)

Requests Now

105

After Optimization

35

The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Enfield Doors. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

enfielddoors.co.uk accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

enfielddoors.co.uk best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

enfielddoors.co.uk SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Enfielddoors.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Enfielddoors.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Enfield Doors. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: