7.7 sec in total
146 ms
6.4 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Engle Lane content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about englelane.org
Visit englelane.orgWe analyzed Englelane.org page load time and found that the first response time was 146 ms and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
englelane.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value350 ms
73/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value9.6 s
29/100
10%
146 ms
4051 ms
25 ms
25 ms
185 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Englelane.org, 19% (16 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 12% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Englelane.org.
Page size can be reduced by 299.2 kB (4%)
8.1 MB
7.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Englelane.org main page is 8.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 179.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 179.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Engle Lane images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 85.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.6 kB or 25% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Englelane.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.1 kB or 26% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (63%)
67
25
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Engle Lane. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
englelane.org
146 ms
englelane.org
4051 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
25 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
25 ms
utilities.css
185 ms
general.css
186 ms
style.min.css
131 ms
css
31 ms
style.css
68 ms
jetpack.css
3 ms
main.css
116 ms
main.css
138 ms
main-media-query.css
183 ms
animations.css
184 ms
utilities.js
192 ms
jquery.min.js
9 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
10 ms
popper-1.16.1.min.js
204 ms
tippy-5.2.1.min.js
206 ms
et-core-unified-44.min.css
160 ms
animate.css
214 ms
magnific-popup.css
216 ms
style.css
215 ms
style.css
213 ms
style.css
217 ms
et-custom-divibars-1376329-44-17055178547791.min.css
221 ms
et-custom-divimegapro-75-44-17055225207314.css
281 ms
image-cdn.js
285 ms
scripts.min.js
461 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
283 ms
jquery.mobile.js
287 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
285 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
348 ms
main.js
415 ms
common.js
349 ms
e-202403.js
13 ms
public.min.js
353 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
413 ms
jquery.throttle.debounce.min.js
413 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
414 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
421 ms
custom.js
507 ms
main.js
508 ms
actual.min.js
509 ms
jquery.exitintent.min.js
508 ms
sticky-elements.js
579 ms
ELT-2024.png
2029 ms
ELT-Hairspray.jpg
49 ms
CTIWY.jpg
52 ms
AdamsFamily.jpg
88 ms
ELT-Hairspray1.jpg
89 ms
ELT-LesMis3.jpg
78 ms
1960.jpg
174 ms
ELT-SisterAct.jpg
54 ms
ELT-Alice.jpg
86 ms
ELT-LesMis2.jpg
114 ms
MusicMan.jpg
192 ms
ThatsEntertainment.jpg
89 ms
1963.jpg
191 ms
ELT-LesMis.jpg
117 ms
ELT-LionKingJr.jpg
157 ms
1964.jpg
120 ms
ELT-LOGO-2.png
628 ms
CatchThumb.png
378 ms
39StepsThumb.png
381 ms
SomethingRottenThumb.png
384 ms
KaosThumb.png
385 ms
363928258_2713993942089939_2373617775839490973_n.png
913 ms
ArkThumb.png
538 ms
modules.woff
126 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7myRJTVPNI4.woff
41 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7myjJTVPNI4.woff
49 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mz9JTVPNI4.woff
66 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mwjJTVPNI4.woff
75 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7myjJDVPNI4.woff
77 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mx9IjVPNI4.woff
77 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mxEIjVPNI4.woff
76 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mwjIjVPNI4.woff
77 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mwKIjVPNI4.woff
74 ms
daaDSSYiLGqEal3MvdA_FOL_3FkN6zn0bw.woff
110 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
212 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
95 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
132 ms
englelane.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
englelane.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
englelane.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Englelane.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Englelane.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
englelane.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Engle Lane. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: