Tools & Wizards About Us
enmedica.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

enmedica.de

Heilpraktiker Berlin mit Bestnoten - Willkommen bei enMedica

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

467 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

284 ms

enmedica.de screenshot

About Website

Visit enmedica.de now to see the best up-to-date EnMedica content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about enmedica.de

Ihre Heilpraktiker in Berlin. Chronisch krank? Allergien? Hautprobleme? Unverträglichkeiten? Seit Jahren? Wir kümmern uns darum.

Visit enmedica.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Enmedica.de page load time and found that the first response time was 467 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

enmedica.de performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,730 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.481

18/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

enmedica.de

467 ms

enmedica.de

1327 ms

gtm.js

71 ms

widgetkit-606b0206-3eb408ab.css

229 ms

bootstrap-ece94b2c.css

352 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Enmedica.de, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Enmedica.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 102.8 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Enmedica.de main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 615.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 34.3 kB

  • Original 47.4 kB
  • After minification 44.6 kB
  • After compression 13.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.3 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 26.5 kB

  • Original 615.6 kB
  • After minification 589.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EnMedica images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 39.9 kB

  • Original 474.7 kB
  • After minification 474.7 kB
  • After compression 434.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 57.3 kB
  • After minification 57.3 kB
  • After compression 55.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Enmedica.de has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (45%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

35

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EnMedica. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

enmedica.de

enmedica.de

467 ms

enmedica.de

enmedica.de

1327 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

71 ms

widgetkit-606b0206-3eb408ab.css

widgetkit-606b0206-3eb408ab.css

229 ms

bootstrap-ece94b2c.css

bootstrap-ece94b2c.css

352 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

441 ms

jquery.min-186cc3f7.js

jquery.min-186cc3f7.js

558 ms

jquery-noconflict-80e52df6.js

jquery-noconflict-80e52df6.js

441 ms

jquery-migrate.min-e980d94a.js

jquery-migrate.min-e980d94a.js

443 ms

widgetkit-c90a6ef2-631676e8.js

widgetkit-c90a6ef2-631676e8.js

446 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

464 ms

core.js

core.js

553 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

802 ms

api.js

api.js

49 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

556 ms

template-1f6c11f0.css

template-1f6c11f0.css

682 ms

template-7eab22d6.js

template-7eab22d6.js

586 ms

script.js

script.js

780 ms

front.css

front.css

669 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

669 ms

129 ms

widget-*be5mkU5t9jYvTKc33KGgkjoWR70gcKme8edfG3fguwE4JnxjbPkhqpFuRT2yvPxnmUBXxWKhlLIjXSWhr-fGAiFppJzsERdBoABpUs9HzcxKaIXYxclX8UndiX9yvAx8zEopdSKNPFcKtqfI4YlBr6GpFGD5KyE-R5dfdsctu00.js

widget-*be5mkU5t9jYvTKc33KGgkjoWR70gcKme8edfG3fguwE4JnxjbPkhqpFuRT2yvPxnmUBXxWKhlLIjXSWhr-fGAiFppJzsERdBoABpUs9HzcxKaIXYxclX8UndiX9yvAx8zEopdSKNPFcKtqfI4YlBr6GpFGD5KyE-R5dfdsctu00.js

322 ms

js

js

96 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

120 ms

mediaelement-and-player.js

mediaelement-and-player.js

222 ms

spotlight.js

spotlight.js

210 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

375 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

373 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

372 ms

widget_landscape_300_de_1.png

widget_landscape_300_de_1.png

484 ms

social.png

social.png

479 ms

social-icons-dark.png

social-icons-dark.png

479 ms

logo.png

logo.png

479 ms

separator.png

separator.png

478 ms

header-bottom.png

header-bottom.png

477 ms

menu-li-active.png

menu-li-active.png

477 ms

Heilpraktiker_Berlin_Jana_Seifert.jpg

Heilpraktiker_Berlin_Jana_Seifert.jpg

565 ms

nav.png

nav.png

481 ms

mid-gradient.png

mid-gradient.png

481 ms

mod-dot.png

mod-dot.png

480 ms

Unterschrift-JS.png

Unterschrift-JS.png

480 ms

Heilpraktiker_kennenlernen.png

Heilpraktiker_kennenlernen.png

563 ms

Dozentin_Arche_Medica.png

Dozentin_Arche_Medica.png

564 ms

Elektroakupunktur_nach_Voll.jpg

Elektroakupunktur_nach_Voll.jpg

674 ms

Homoeopathie.jpg

Homoeopathie.jpg

566 ms

Reizstromtherapie.jpg

Reizstromtherapie.jpg

566 ms

Orthomolekularmedizin.jpg

Orthomolekularmedizin.jpg

676 ms

Heilpraktikerin_Jana_Seifert.jpg

Heilpraktikerin_Jana_Seifert.jpg

785 ms

enMedica-logo-transparent.png

enMedica-logo-transparent.png

675 ms

top10-top20-bg.png

top10-top20-bg.png

306 ms

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

757 ms

footer-gradient.png

footer-gradient.png

638 ms

block-div-h.png

block-div-h.png

734 ms

modal-gloss.png

modal-gloss.png

743 ms

slideshow.js

slideshow.js

494 ms

close.png

close.png

460 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

563 ms

dropdown-bg.png

dropdown-bg.png

562 ms

menu-sep.png

menu-sep.png

563 ms

back-to-top.png

back-to-top.png

564 ms

menu-icons.png

menu-icons.png

566 ms

collect

collect

58 ms

collect

collect

69 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

15 ms

Goldfischglas_enMedica.jpg

Goldfischglas_enMedica.jpg

332 ms

Heilpraktiker_Elektroakupunktur.jpg

Heilpraktiker_Elektroakupunktur.jpg

307 ms

Homoeopathie_Berlin.jpg

Homoeopathie_Berlin.jpg

306 ms

Accessibility Review

enmedica.de accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

enmedica.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

enmedica.de SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Enmedica.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Enmedica.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

enmedica.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of EnMedica. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: