Tools & Wizards About Us
enpor.eu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

enpor.eu

ENPOR • Energy poor households in the private rented sector

Page Load Speed

12.9 sec in total

First Response

13 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

11.2 sec

enpor.eu screenshot

About Website

Welcome to enpor.eu homepage info - get ready to check ENPOR best content right away, or after learning these important things about enpor.eu

Achieving the full energy transition potential calls for a paradigm shift, and many solutions are investigated to involve as much people as possible and support them reducing their energy consumption.

Visit enpor.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Enpor.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 12.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

enpor.eu performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value31.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,220 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

enpor.eu

13 ms

227 ms

506 ms

css2

53 ms

js

71 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Enpor.eu, 36% (16 requests) were made to Ieecp.org and 24% (11 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (773 ms) relates to the external source Ieecp.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 550.7 kB (49%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

581.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Enpor.eu main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 495.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 200.3 kB

  • Original 234.5 kB
  • After minification 157.6 kB
  • After compression 34.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 76.8 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 200.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 33.6 kB
  • After minification 33.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ENPOR images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 368.1 kB
  • After minification 368.1 kB
  • After compression 361.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 343.7 kB

  • Original 495.8 kB
  • After minification 495.0 kB
  • After compression 152.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Enpor.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 343.7 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (59%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ENPOR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

enpor.eu

enpor.eu

13 ms

227 ms

506 ms

css2

css2

53 ms

js

js

71 ms

a5ff7.css

a5ff7.css

41 ms

455bf.css

455bf.css

42 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

40 ms

a5926.css

a5926.css

51 ms

daterangepicker.css

daterangepicker.css

42 ms

aos.css

aos.css

68 ms

dd2aa.js

dd2aa.js

68 ms

7548f.js

7548f.js

48 ms

aos.css

aos.css

17 ms

CIPc-aYzHx4

CIPc-aYzHx4

222 ms

QABoAQ5F2lA

QABoAQ5F2lA

215 ms

bg-footer.jpg

bg-footer.jpg

29 ms

wave-bg.svg

wave-bg.svg

773 ms

yO_xsZA2olw

yO_xsZA2olw

132 ms

classic-071822.css

classic-071822.css

26 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

13 ms

facebook-icon.svg

facebook-icon.svg

654 ms

tweet-icon.svg

tweet-icon.svg

653 ms

linkedin-icon.svg

linkedin-icon.svg

650 ms

youtube-icon.svg

youtube-icon.svg

649 ms

instagram-icon.svg

instagram-icon.svg

651 ms

arrow-up-icon.svg

arrow-up-icon.svg

723 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

11 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

104 ms

base.js

base.js

133 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

78 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

342 ms

base.js

base.js

367 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

484 ms

2sDfZG1Wl4Lcnbu6iQ.ttf

2sDfZG1Wl4Lcnbu6iQ.ttf

476 ms

2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCJW8Dbw.ttf

2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCJW8Dbw.ttf

532 ms

2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCNWgDbw.ttf

2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCNWgDbw.ttf

535 ms

Yq6W-LyURyLy-aKKHztAvA.ttf

Yq6W-LyURyLy-aKKHztAvA.ttf

535 ms

Yq6V-LyURyLy-aKyow.ttf

Yq6V-LyURyLy-aKyow.ttf

534 ms

ovyGwAc4kItbttuxuA1iZx_iXfQI5IinMcQKs2l-Uc8.js

ovyGwAc4kItbttuxuA1iZx_iXfQI5IinMcQKs2l-Uc8.js

473 ms

embed.js

embed.js

340 ms

embed.js

embed.js

89 ms

id

id

87 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

89 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

87 ms

Accessibility Review

enpor.eu accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

enpor.eu best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

enpor.eu SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Enpor.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Enpor.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

enpor.eu

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ENPOR. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: