Tools & Wizards About Us
ensmile.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

ensmile.com

Invisible Dental Aligners - Ensmile

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

446 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

94 ms

ensmile.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ensmile.com now to see the best up-to-date Ensmile content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ensmile.com

Ensmile is AI-Enabled treatment planning and 3d technology manufacturing company of private label OEM invisible clear dental aligners.

Visit ensmile.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ensmile.com page load time and found that the first response time was 446 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ensmile.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value13.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value31.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.6 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value300 ms

79/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.424

23/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.5 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ensmile.com

446 ms

ensmile.com

1398 ms

slick.css

306 ms

slick-theme.css

307 ms

style.min.css

511 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Ensmile.com, 14% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Ensmile.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (78%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

506.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ensmile.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 70.7 kB

  • Original 87.6 kB
  • After minification 86.7 kB
  • After compression 16.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 8.0 kB
  • After minification 5.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ensmile needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.6 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 684.3 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 920.6 kB
  • After compression 324.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 684.3 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 160.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ensmile.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (94%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ensmile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ensmile.com

ensmile.com

446 ms

ensmile.com

ensmile.com

1398 ms

slick.css

slick.css

306 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

307 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

511 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

525 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

629 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

308 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

318 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

418 ms

blocks.style.build.css

blocks.style.build.css

425 ms

style.css

style.css

432 ms

blocks.style.build.css

blocks.style.build.css

530 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

530 ms

rs-logo-grid.css

rs-logo-grid.css

537 ms

logo.css

logo.css

610 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

640 ms

tlpteam.css

tlpteam.css

945 ms

team-sc.css

team-sc.css

749 ms

tlp-el-team.min.css

tlp-el-team.min.css

647 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

910 ms

bootstrap-icons.min.css

bootstrap-icons.min.css

848 ms

style-index.css

style-index.css

747 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

765 ms

css

css

26 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1056 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

980 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

802 ms

slick.js

slick.js

864 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

47 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

923 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

923 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

979 ms

react.min.js

react.min.js

1006 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

1027 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1127 ms

script.js

script.js

1067 ms

script.js

script.js

1074 ms

js

js

64 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1081 ms

fontAwesome.min.css

fontAwesome.min.css

1481 ms

style.css

style.css

1108 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

1109 ms

main.js

main.js

1012 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1087 ms

theme.min.js

theme.min.js

951 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

944 ms

lazyLoad.js

lazyLoad.js

971 ms

script.js

script.js

891 ms

float.js

float.js

938 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

16 ms

cropped-logo.png

cropped-logo.png

202 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

42 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

59 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

74 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

76 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

76 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

75 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

76 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

73 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

76 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

156 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

142 ms

Accessibility Review

ensmile.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

ensmile.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ensmile.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ensmile.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ensmile.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ensmile.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ensmile. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: