11.8 sec in total
394 ms
8.8 sec
2.6 sec
Click here to check amazing Enterprise Labels content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about enterpriselabels.com
How do color label printers from Epson, Primera and Afinia stack up? Our team studied the reviews to find the best color label printer overall.
Visit enterpriselabels.comWe analyzed Enterpriselabels.com page load time and found that the first response time was 394 ms and then it took 11.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
enterpriselabels.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value13.2 s
0/100
25%
Value15.6 s
0/100
10%
Value2,300 ms
5/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.0 s
7/100
10%
394 ms
1433 ms
165 ms
39 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Enterpriselabels.com, 18% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4 sec) belongs to the original domain Enterpriselabels.com.
Page size can be reduced by 318.2 kB (17%)
1.9 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Enterpriselabels.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 312.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 312.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Enterprise Labels images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (43%)
65
37
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Enterprise Labels. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
enterpriselabels.com
394 ms
www.enterpriselabels.com
1433 ms
js
165 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
39 ms
moxie.min.js
40 ms
plupload.min.js
40 ms
jquery.min.js
45 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
777 ms
css
67 ms
css
68 ms
js
158 ms
css
94 ms
onejs
23 ms
321534646
692 ms
322840432
691 ms
base.css
76 ms
style.min.css
152 ms
thrive_flat.css
260 ms
style.css
247 ms
style.min.css
811 ms
link-buttons.min.css
666 ms
animate.min.css
796 ms
spinkit.min.css
653 ms
709240962
640 ms
321534623
653 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
501 ms
masonry.min.js
646 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
525 ms
frontend.min.js
661 ms
frontend.min.js
1380 ms
script.min.js
646 ms
ads.js
664 ms
lazyload.min.js
661 ms
q
138 ms
analytics.js
647 ms
js
634 ms
764261627-371fe9e719b1f6d2f27c8c2cd36276877b216b1c305fc899b89ff6f28d90e13a-d
782 ms
765828330-7257e461e5e409f1c144aa155668de30a209aebe42537381b0990b85376ec153-d
859 ms
1430785893-ac93c759d2cc850a0c8bb747342f3e037b226ac2f95f6e7ab818ea303798aa16-d
751 ms
764261578-8743902228a97c4ed6c9660b652cebb20d50c0fae9ed321cb7aefa7cfbc27286-d
986 ms
collect
201 ms
collect
197 ms
collect
84 ms
onejs
83 ms
print.css
1065 ms
8AD3jaY2BkYGDgAWIxIGZiYARCESBmAfMYAAR6AEMAAAABAAAAANXtRbgAAAAA2AhRFAAAAADYCNuG
106 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
235 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
235 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
925 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
926 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf
924 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xk.ttf
926 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf
925 ms
CW_C4000_Lifestyle_03-scaled.jpg
1247 ms
Epson-CW-C4000.png
712 ms
C6000P.png
712 ms
lx500-1.png
1048 ms
matte.jpg
702 ms
Color-Label-Printers.png
1702 ms
GHS.png
2074 ms
Epson-TM-C3500-Inks.gif
3008 ms
CW_C4000_Lifestyle_11-scaled.jpg
1973 ms
CW_C4000_Product_03_Right_Angle.jpg
1704 ms
LB_logowhite_500x500.png
1705 ms
CW_C4000_Lifestyle_12.jpg
2288 ms
ColorWorks_CW-6000P_Product_01-scaled.jpg
1703 ms
ColorWorks_CW-6000P_Product_03-700x525.jpg
3202 ms
lx500.jpg
2487 ms
Primera-LX610-main.png
3976 ms
L502.png
3259 ms
lx900.png
2926 ms
beda1987.jpg
3039 ms
admin-ajax.php
3375 ms
afinial301.png
1881 ms
admin-ajax.php
579 ms
spinner.gif
569 ms
css
15 ms
admin-ajax.php
428 ms
Banner.png
524 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf
9 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf
110 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQ.ttf
109 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf
110 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf
108 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf
108 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf
110 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf
111 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrQ.ttf
109 ms
enterpriselabels.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
enterpriselabels.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
enterpriselabels.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Enterpriselabels.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Enterpriselabels.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
enterpriselabels.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Enterprise Labels. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: