Tools & Wizards About Us
envertec.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

envertec.com

Envertech High Efficiency Solar Microinverters - Unlock the Power of the Sun

Page Load Speed

10.9 sec in total

First Response

426 ms

Resources Loaded

9.7 sec

Page Rendered

836 ms

envertec.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to envertec.com homepage info - get ready to check Envertec best content right away, or after learning these important things about envertec.com

Unlock the Power of the Sun with Envertech Microinverters

Visit envertec.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Envertec.com page load time and found that the first response time was 426 ms and then it took 10.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

envertec.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value800 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.303

39/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.5 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

envertec.com

426 ms

envertec.com

363 ms

www.envertec.com

429 ms

www.envertec.com

359 ms

style.css

263 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Envertec.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7 sec) belongs to the original domain Envertec.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 89.1 kB (4%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Envertec.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 15.1 kB

  • Original 19.5 kB
  • After minification 16.4 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.0 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 46.3 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Envertec images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 94.4 kB
  • After minification 94.3 kB
  • After compression 79.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 12.2 kB

  • Original 55.4 kB
  • After minification 55.4 kB
  • After compression 43.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Envertec.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.2 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (31%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Envertec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

envertec.com

envertec.com

426 ms

envertec.com

envertec.com

363 ms

www.envertec.com

www.envertec.com

429 ms

www.envertec.com

www.envertec.com

359 ms

style.css

style.css

263 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

339 ms

jquery.cookie.min.js

jquery.cookie.min.js

254 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

1020 ms

common.js

common.js

606 ms

scroll.js

scroll.js

276 ms

js

js

50 ms

count.js

count.js

337 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

706 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

106 ms

icomoon.css

icomoon.css

159 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

140 ms

lang.png

lang.png

120 ms

b2.jpg

b2.jpg

3896 ms

b1.jpg

b1.jpg

671 ms

a1.jpg

a1.jpg

2760 ms

a2.jpg

a2.jpg

3071 ms

a3.jpg

a3.jpg

1572 ms

a4.jpg

a4.jpg

2389 ms

shad.png

shad.png

1266 ms

index_news.jpg

index_news.jpg

3215 ms

p1.webp

p1.webp

3152 ms

p2.webp

p2.webp

3691 ms

p3.webp

p3.webp

7034 ms

s1.png

s1.png

3323 ms

s2.png

s2.png

3520 ms

s4.png

s4.png

3382 ms

earth.png

earth.png

4244 ms

local1.jpg

local1.jpg

3801 ms

local2.jpg

local2.jpg

4778 ms

local3.jpg

local3.jpg

4126 ms

subscriptions.jpg

subscriptions.jpg

6144 ms

Roboto-Light.ttf

Roboto-Light.ttf

5234 ms

Roboto-Regular.ttf

Roboto-Regular.ttf

6665 ms

Roboto-Bold.ttf

Roboto-Bold.ttf

6166 ms

Roboto-Black.ttf

Roboto-Black.ttf

6816 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

5825 ms

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

11 ms

Accessibility Review

envertec.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Definition list items are not wrapped in <dl> elements

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

envertec.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

envertec.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Envertec.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Envertec.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

envertec.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Envertec. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: