Tools & Wizards About Us
ephespage.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

ephespage.de

Webentwicklung und mehr von Ephraim Härer - ephra.im

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

412 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

151 ms

ephespage.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ephespage.de homepage info - get ready to check Ephespage best content right away, or after learning these important things about ephespage.de

TYPO3 Entwicklung / Upgrade / Wartung / Performanceoptimierung, WordPress Upgrade / Wartung, Webseiten DSGVO-Optimierung und Anpassung, Schnittstellen

Visit ephespage.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Ephespage.de page load time and found that the first response time was 412 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ephespage.de performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

62/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ephespage.de

412 ms

ephespage.de

477 ms

ephra.im

807 ms

webfont.css

114 ms

merged-62bb9eb8e5c5d58fb56d99bf2af9e4d9-29a8e018c01a38f3a7bc48e2f893523f.css

228 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Ephespage.de, 90% (18 requests) were made to Ephra.im. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (807 ms) relates to the external source Ephra.im.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 47.9 kB (5%)

Content Size

990.9 kB

After Optimization

943.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Ephespage.de main page is 990.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 936.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 47.8 kB

  • Original 54.4 kB
  • After minification 30.6 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.8 kB, which is 44% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.8 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 143 B

  • Original 936.5 kB
  • After minification 936.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ephespage images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (29%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ephespage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ephespage.de

ephespage.de

412 ms

ephespage.de

ephespage.de

477 ms

ephra.im

ephra.im

807 ms

webfont.css

webfont.css

114 ms

merged-62bb9eb8e5c5d58fb56d99bf2af9e4d9-29a8e018c01a38f3a7bc48e2f893523f.css

merged-62bb9eb8e5c5d58fb56d99bf2af9e4d9-29a8e018c01a38f3a7bc48e2f893523f.css

228 ms

merged-9c552d8f3eef9711de0154ec4ddf1aa6-95471f59cad269e821494aae62b4c12d.css

merged-9c552d8f3eef9711de0154ec4ddf1aa6-95471f59cad269e821494aae62b4c12d.css

593 ms

merged-a1a09b1b6501ba1c5da44ff267854f0a-5907f1042c7c7a157ce7b726caf639e8.js

merged-a1a09b1b6501ba1c5da44ff267854f0a-5907f1042c7c7a157ce7b726caf639e8.js

337 ms

merged-002a3d1e65b4206d5605e560c09ab72a-1422811d4a1d7946e0ac2e5a209fe13c.js

merged-002a3d1e65b4206d5605e560c09ab72a-1422811d4a1d7946e0ac2e5a209fe13c.js

589 ms

merged-ff814ef5bf3754b1a9f22f6f0447a270-eeefa9853f765d8b26196daacb5b71d0.js

merged-ff814ef5bf3754b1a9f22f6f0447a270-eeefa9853f765d8b26196daacb5b71d0.js

469 ms

Form.min-8a45011b72a6062eeff3c6627ac24ff0.js

Form.min-8a45011b72a6062eeff3c6627ac24ff0.js

456 ms

Powermail_Form.min-db7c797185e2f4f50f9e5f69cbd43be5.js

Powermail_Form.min-db7c797185e2f4f50f9e5f69cbd43be5.js

339 ms

ephra.im_logo.png

ephra.im_logo.png

118 ms

csm_IMG_20170513_095653_c0a94326d7.jpg

csm_IMG_20170513_095653_c0a94326d7.jpg

664 ms

csm_IMG_20181103_101030_542_5e86337fc4.jpg

csm_IMG_20181103_101030_542_5e86337fc4.jpg

557 ms

csm_IMG_20190817_101647_399_008f21c7ca.jpg

csm_IMG_20190817_101647_399_008f21c7ca.jpg

444 ms

csm_slide_01_c8f5931d49.jpg

csm_slide_01_c8f5931d49.jpg

335 ms

csm_TYPO3_Association_Community_Member_364010a2a5_9c40499aa6.png

csm_TYPO3_Association_Community_Member_364010a2a5_9c40499aa6.png

119 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

397 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

180 ms

bootstrappackageicon.woff

bootstrappackageicon.woff

291 ms

Accessibility Review

ephespage.de accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ephespage.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ephespage.de SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ephespage.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ephespage.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ephespage.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ephespage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: