Report Summary

  • 97

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

eresidue.com

eResidue Pro

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

120 ms

Resources Loaded

804 ms

Page Rendered

791 ms

eresidue.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to eresidue.com homepage info - get ready to check EResidue best content right away, or after learning these important things about eresidue.com

Biologics & Vaccines

Visit eresidue.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Eresidue.com page load time and found that the first response time was 120 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eresidue.com performance score

97

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

92/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eresidue.com

120 ms

eresidue.com

616 ms

style.min.css

25 ms

flickity.css

14 ms

style.min.css

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Eresidue.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (616 ms) belongs to the original domain Eresidue.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 72.2 kB (41%)

Content Size

174.6 kB

After Optimization

102.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Eresidue.com main page is 174.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 82.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 64.6 kB

  • Original 81.7 kB
  • After minification 81.3 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 82.4 kB
  • After minification 82.4 kB
  • After compression 76.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 10.5 kB
  • After minification 10.5 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eresidue.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (69%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EResidue. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

eresidue.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

eresidue.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

eresidue.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eresidue.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eresidue.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of EResidue. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: