4.7 sec in total
391 ms
4.1 sec
179 ms
Click here to check amazing ERGO content for Lithuania. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ergo.lt
ERGO draudimo paslaugos privatiems asmenims bei verslui. Draudimas internetu greitesnis ir patogesnis būdas pasirūpinti savo transporto, būsto ir kito turto saugumu
Visit ergo.ltWe analyzed Ergo.lt page load time and found that the first response time was 391 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
ergo.lt performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value12.8 s
0/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value1,780 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.441
21/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
391 ms
673 ms
135 ms
497 ms
348 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Ergo.lt, 5% (3 requests) were made to Gtlt.hit.gemius.pl and 3% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (843 ms) belongs to the original domain Ergo.lt.
Page size can be reduced by 398.1 kB (50%)
794.1 kB
396.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Ergo.lt main page is 794.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 411.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ERGO images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 303.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 303.9 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ergo.lt needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 55.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (67%)
64
21
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ERGO. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ergo.lt
391 ms
privatiems-klientams
673 ms
default.css
135 ms
screen.css
497 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
348 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
693 ms
jquery-ui.js
822 ms
jquery.cookie.js
358 ms
jquery.ui.timepicker.js
716 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
578 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js
479 ms
easySlider.js
601 ms
inquiry.js
617 ms
scripts.js
809 ms
flowplayer-3.2.6.min.js
843 ms
flowplayer.playlist-3.0.8.min.js
738 ms
videoPlayer.js
806 ms
cookie_notice.js
841 ms
flash.min.js
125 ms
fbds.js
175 ms
gemius.js
593 ms
logo.ergo.gif
182 ms
244.jpg
374 ms
248.jpg
245 ms
final_vairuotoju.jpg
180 ms
final_kelioniu.jpg
179 ms
final_nelaimingu.jpg
178 ms
dviraciu_naujiena_kampe.jpg
245 ms
ico.facebook.png
248 ms
btn.search.gif
254 ms
Facebook_like_web.jpg
256 ms
ergo_imones_filmas2.jpg
362 ms
sertifikatas.png
363 ms
gtm.js
84 ms
bg.header.jpg
350 ms
bg.menu.gif
352 ms
sprite.menu_actions.gif
356 ms
bg.left_menu_level1.gif
458 ms
bullet.arrow.gif
458 ms
bg.side_block_head.gif
466 ms
bg.gradient.png
470 ms
ico.list_bullet.gif
471 ms
form-info.png
475 ms
form-field-error2.png
575 ms
button-grey2.png
574 ms
button-red2.png
582 ms
sprite.sidebars_toggle.png
579 ms
sprite.btn_red.gif
578 ms
sprite.content_tabs.gif
583 ms
bg.tab_gradient.png
674 ms
bullet.text_list.png
674 ms
sprite.print.gif
685 ms
sprite.feedback.gif
692 ms
sprite.send_friend.gif
691 ms
sprite.social_networks.gif
697 ms
bg.searchbox.gif
782 ms
bg.side_block_head_right.gif
784 ms
ga.js
34 ms
ui-icons_222222_256x240.png
686 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
97 ms
fpdata.js
115 ms
lsget.html
481 ms
print.css
127 ms
22 ms
redot.js
119 ms
ergo.lt accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ergo.lt best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ergo.lt SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
LT
LT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ergo.lt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Lithuanian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ergo.lt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ergo.lt
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ERGO. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: