19 sec in total
230 ms
18.3 sec
448 ms
Welcome to esigate.org homepage info - get ready to check ESIGate best content right away, or after learning these important things about esigate.org
Esigate is a http proxy, with full support of ESI specification and additional features to make web application integration fast and easy.
Visit esigate.orgWe analyzed Esigate.org page load time and found that the first response time was 230 ms and then it took 18.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
esigate.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value19.5 s
0/100
10%
Value24.9 s
0/100
25%
Value23.3 s
0/100
10%
Value3,900 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.281
43/100
15%
Value29.8 s
0/100
10%
230 ms
564 ms
1025 ms
1644 ms
4099 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Esigate.org, 8% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Syndication.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (13.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Esigate.org.
Page size can be reduced by 28.0 kB (15%)
184.2 kB
156.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Esigate.org main page is 184.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 83.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 322 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ESIGate images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 899 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Esigate.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 899 B or 67% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (20%)
46
37
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ESIGate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
esigate.org
230 ms
bootstrap.min.css
564 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
1025 ms
less-1.3.1.min.js
1644 ms
gh-fork-ribbon.css
4099 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
4129 ms
bootstrap.min.js
4130 ms
users.js
4133 ms
project_factoids_stats.js
37 ms
css
29 ms
ga.js
158 ms
glyphicons-halflings-white.png
397 ms
logo.png
918 ms
assemble1.png
1903 ms
assemble2.png
1369 ms
assemble3.png
2423 ms
assemble4.png
2889 ms
cas-logo.png
3402 ms
maven-logo.png
3869 ms
centralRepository_logo.png
4369 ms
smile.png
4868 ms
nicolas-richeton.png
5470 ms
capgemini.png
5867 ms
jahia.png
6370 ms
sflogo.php
326 ms
widgets.js
251 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7w.woff
189 ms
__utm.gif
102 ms
gradient.png
6690 ms
gradient2.png
7215 ms
glyphicons-halflings.png
7688 ms
sncf.png
8112 ms
europcar.png
8634 ms
ag2r.png
9115 ms
apec.png
9590 ms
capgemini.png
10111 ms
canson.png
10607 ms
smile.png
11087 ms
idmacif.png
11643 ms
manitou.png
12118 ms
jahia.png
12587 ms
systalians.png
13115 ms
carif-oref.png
13632 ms
widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html
76 ms
settings
183 ms
button.d2f864f87f544dc0c11d7d712a191c1f.js
42 ms
embeds
71 ms
embeds
72 ms
tweet_button.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.en.html
50 ms
esigate.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
esigate.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
esigate.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Esigate.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Esigate.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
esigate.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ESIGate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: