1.6 sec in total
107 ms
971 ms
538 ms
Visit essium.co now to see the best up-to-date Essium content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about essium.co
Home
Visit essium.coWe analyzed Essium.co page load time and found that the first response time was 107 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
essium.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.4 s
1/100
10%
Value38.8 s
0/100
25%
Value50.6 s
0/100
10%
Value50,460 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.246
50/100
15%
Value66.5 s
0/100
10%
107 ms
15 ms
91 ms
600 ms
600 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Essium.co, 56% (15 requests) were made to Essium.essiumllc.netdna-cdn.com and 30% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (733 ms) relates to the external source Essium.essiumllc.netdna-cdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 437.6 kB (30%)
1.4 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Essium.co main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 861.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Essium images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 339.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 339.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
18
18
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Essium. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
essium.co
107 ms
analytics.js
15 ms
logo.png
91 ms
reimagine-onboarding-automate-processes.png
600 ms
reimagine-onboarding-engage-talent.png
600 ms
reimagine-onboarding-measure-analyze.png
733 ms
building-blocks-define-process.png
591 ms
people-process.png
729 ms
system-integration.png
732 ms
robot-automation-2.png
733 ms
autoptimize_dea6bb54789a753f2d7e2b22c054f713.js
587 ms
robot-automation-1.png
715 ms
interested-in-learning-more-300x162.png
715 ms
pre.gif
711 ms
collect
46 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
32 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTeY5mlVXtdNkpsMpKkrDXP4.woff
84 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSuY5mlVXtdNkpsMpKkrDXP4.woff
48 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzOY5mlVXtdNkpsMpKkrDXP4.woff
61 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-huY5mlVXtdNkpsMpKkrDXP4.woff
106 ms
C6HYlRF50SGJq1XyXj04z0Is04IdwfM8211RGOj6sr8.woff
61 ms
C6HYlRF50SGJq1XyXj04z0_a8dEi9IWWZoJOYfQmBw4.woff
95 ms
xgzbb53t8j-Mo-vYa23n5uY5mlVXtdNkpsMpKkrDXP4.woff
95 ms
bg-intro.jpg
6 ms
bg-features.jpg
138 ms
bg-automation.jpg
147 ms
bg-services.jpg
133 ms
essium.co accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
essium.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
essium.co SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Essium.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Essium.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
essium.co
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Essium. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: