4.3 sec in total
795 ms
3.5 sec
56 ms
Click here to check amazing Esthetics content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about esthetics.studio
Esthetics.Studio is located in Poway, San Diego. Esthetics studio is the best eyelash extension, facial and brow shaping studio in Poway. Esthetics studio offers an array of beauty services like class...
Visit esthetics.studioWe analyzed Esthetics.studio page load time and found that the first response time was 795 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
esthetics.studio performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value13.6 s
0/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value670 ms
45/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value17.0 s
4/100
10%
795 ms
29 ms
28 ms
1173 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Esthetics.studio, 42% (28 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 36% (24 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (36%)
3.1 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Esthetics.studio main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 620.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 620.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 300.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Esthetics needs image optimization as it can save up to 300.5 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 184.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 184.9 kB or 42% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (26%)
39
29
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Esthetics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.esthetics.studio
795 ms
minified.js
29 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
28 ms
polyfill.min.js
1173 ms
thunderbolt-commons.c1d8ed1c.bundle.min.js
40 ms
main.4a2d1e74.bundle.min.js
42 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
39 ms
lodash.min.js
192 ms
react.production.min.js
40 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
42 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
41 ms
Esthetics%20Studio%20black.png
295 ms
11062b_74c3bd45471e49a7a0c85a0953bc8149~mv2_d_5478_3652_s_4_2.jpg
271 ms
nsplsh_416133414c744978454759~mv2_d_3456_4608_s_4_2.jpg
375 ms
Eyebrow%20Hair%20Removal_edited_edited_edited_edited_edited.jpg
468 ms
Woman%20having%20an%20eyelash%20extension.jpeg
271 ms
GettyImages-1166627892_edited_edited.jpg
398 ms
971962_ee978034b73046df8c8b5166bcee2438~mv2.jpg
436 ms
971962_2766ea49ef524059a041ac179b4c4871~mv2.png
478 ms
971962_3b1987ecd81040669ec7de25eec60eb5~mv2.jpg
460 ms
971962_a7bac6b16e17460f81a99235833e3135~mv2.jpg
570 ms
971962_c449e7397cd34ad78969b1b1afafd866~mv2.jpg
563 ms
971962_8dfb8545e1264212a209efed33a9e538~mv2.jpg
646 ms
971962_e47ba75fb10f4b97a8d287dc5ef22cca~mv2.png
758 ms
971962_c77e3cc194f743a4abb3156cc40e73eb~mv2.jpg
654 ms
971962_ee1dff8156534ae1bf1412f733c5e213~mv2.jpg
648 ms
971962_18979ecf7a00430789a8f9efa459b188~mv2.jpg
761 ms
971962_7ef3c49478fc47849b5f20e94a50b59b~mv2.jpg
799 ms
971962_2a757f4619084843849975d43828af78~mv2.jpg
778 ms
971962_e585bd187c9f45f092a46ab3b9839e2af003.jpg
849 ms
971962_3cb435c2d18a48ad9d64df8832f9ce8bf003.jpg
784 ms
971962_572641f9f55a4dc5970f212fd3ac31a3f003.jpg
1008 ms
971962_d7827623f8454c47bb1c79aea3a892d0f003.jpg
916 ms
11062b_9ddd600e05904778bd70a06fba8f933c~mv2.jpeg
869 ms
Esthetics%20Studio%20gold.png
922 ms
iEjm9hVxcattz37Y8gZwVergGQquJ_f3dxTxEJk8ZKM.woff
97 ms
iEjm9hVxcattz37Y8gZwVebEnH4R5m1MLXJyCi0BC78.woff
90 ms
cormorant-garamond-v7-latin-ext_latin_cyrillic-regular.woff
97 ms
cormorant-garamond-v7-latin-ext_latin_cyrillic-700.woff
97 ms
Fraunces_120pt-Regular.ttf
97 ms
Fraunces_120pt-Light.ttf
96 ms
zuqx3k1yUEl3Eavo-ZPEAhNmD6bOwmI0fiYv_Ehe03s.woff
116 ms
zuqx3k1yUEl3Eavo-ZPEAhX141arjC0UgpdoDjjeeVk.woff
115 ms
cormorant-garamond-v7-latin-ext_latin_cyrillic-italic.woff
116 ms
cormorant-garamond-v7-latin-ext_latin_cyrillic-700italic.woff
116 ms
Fraunces_120pt-Italic.ttf
117 ms
Fraunces_120pt-LightItalic.ttf
118 ms
Fraunces_120pt-SemiBold.ttf
120 ms
Fraunces_120pt-Bold.ttf
118 ms
bundle.min.js
95 ms
DK0eTGXiZjN6yA8zAEyM2UtCETOCmz2wCdel46UOhAM.woff
38 ms
KGBfwabt0ZRLA5W1ywjowW_WCyVccUAWDspcx_4UXqg.woff
39 ms
110 ms
103 ms
109 ms
109 ms
108 ms
106 ms
138 ms
139 ms
142 ms
141 ms
139 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
8 ms
bolt-performance
11 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
4 ms
right-arrow.svg
3 ms
esthetics.studio accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
esthetics.studio best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
esthetics.studio SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Esthetics.studio can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Esthetics.studio main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
esthetics.studio
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Esthetics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: