4.3 sec in total
218 ms
3.9 sec
137 ms
Welcome to etdi.org homepage info - get ready to check Etdi best content right away, or after learning these important things about etdi.org
Search for Training
Visit etdi.orgWe analyzed Etdi.org page load time and found that the first response time was 218 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
etdi.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.1 s
1/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value7.4 s
27/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.2 s
50/100
10%
218 ms
2519 ms
121 ms
213 ms
254 ms
Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Etdi.org, 91% (20 requests) were made to Evangelicaltrainingdirectory.org and 5% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source Evangelicaltrainingdirectory.org.
Page size can be reduced by 331.0 kB (63%)
529.5 kB
198.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Etdi.org main page is 529.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 398.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Etdi images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 270.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 270.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Etdi.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (70%)
20
6
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Etdi. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
etdi.org
218 ms
2519 ms
reset.css
121 ms
evangelical.css
213 ms
template.css
254 ms
chosen.css
275 ms
mootools-core.js
476 ms
core.js
266 ms
mootools-more.js
623 ms
validate.js
326 ms
mootools-yui-compressed.js
22 ms
jquery.min.js
540 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
364 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
361 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
508 ms
system.css
464 ms
template.css
457 ms
system.css
87 ms
mainlogo.jpg
195 ms
crosses_variable.jpg
153 ms
blue-right-arrow.gif
152 ms
chosen-sprite.png
92 ms
etdi.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
etdi.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
etdi.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Etdi.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Etdi.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
etdi.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Etdi. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: