Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

etirapid.com

Fabricantes de etiquetas para impresoras en México | Etirapid

Page Load Speed

14.6 sec in total

First Response

2.2 sec

Resources Loaded

12.1 sec

Page Rendered

308 ms

etirapid.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to etirapid.com homepage info - get ready to check Etirapid best content for Mexico right away, or after learning these important things about etirapid.com

Somos fabricantes de etiquetas y distribuimos impresoras de etiquetas así como etiquetas para impresoras de transferencia térmica. ¡Visítanos!

Visit etirapid.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Etirapid.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 12.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

etirapid.com performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value28.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value31,990 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.181

67/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value47.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

etirapid.com

2194 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

280 ms

jquery-ui.css

30 ms

mgwoocommercebrands.css

204 ms

jckqv-styles.min.css

227 ms

Our browser made a total of 130 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (115 requests) were addressed to the original Etirapid.com, 2% (3 requests) were made to Secure.gravatar.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Etirapid.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (33%)

Content Size

5.4 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Etirapid.com main page is 5.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 179.1 kB

  • Original 201.1 kB
  • After minification 192.8 kB
  • After compression 22.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 179.1 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 96.5 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Etirapid images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 614.8 kB

  • Original 883.7 kB
  • After minification 840.9 kB
  • After compression 268.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 614.8 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 901.4 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 930.4 kB
  • After compression 169.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Etirapid.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 901.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 92 (74%)

Requests Now

125

After Optimization

33

The browser has sent 125 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Etirapid. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

etirapid.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

etirapid.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

etirapid.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Etirapid.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Etirapid.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Etirapid. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: