3.4 sec in total
868 ms
2.1 sec
464 ms
Welcome to evoplus.in homepage info - get ready to check Evoplus best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about evoplus.in
Visit evoplus.inWe analyzed Evoplus.in page load time and found that the first response time was 868 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
evoplus.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value9.4 s
0/100
25%
Value12.2 s
3/100
10%
Value710 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.359
30/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
868 ms
26 ms
138 ms
120 ms
15 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Evoplus.in, 12% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (989 ms) belongs to the original domain Evoplus.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (41%)
4.5 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Evoplus.in main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Evoplus images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 854.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 854.0 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 929.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Evoplus.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 929.0 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (61%)
66
26
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Evoplus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
evoplus.in
868 ms
css
26 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
138 ms
layerslider.css
120 ms
css
15 ms
styles.css
97 ms
style.css
85 ms
font-awesome.min.css
110 ms
style.min.css
149 ms
stylesheet.min.css
306 ms
webkit_stylesheet.css
155 ms
safari_stylesheet.css
166 ms
style_dynamic.css
190 ms
responsive.min.css
196 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
208 ms
js_composer.css
332 ms
custom_css.css
236 ms
greensock.js
283 ms
jquery.js
368 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
368 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
297 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
386 ms
jquery.form.min.js
242 ms
scripts.js
210 ms
qode-like.min.js
240 ms
plugins.js
498 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
240 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
241 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
242 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
282 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
279 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
282 ms
TweenLite.min.js
282 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
306 ms
smoothPageScroll.min.js
307 ms
js
130 ms
default_dynamic.js
288 ms
default.min.js
318 ms
custom_js.js
287 ms
comment-reply.min.js
329 ms
ajax.min.js
337 ms
js_composer_front.js
385 ms
logo.png
424 ms
girl.png
713 ms
close_side_menu.png
201 ms
logo.png
200 ms
background.jpg
593 ms
back3.jpg
245 ms
desk1.png
570 ms
lapt1.png
421 ms
ipad2.png
421 ms
mob1.png
283 ms
mer_banbg.jpg
571 ms
mer1_ban.png
420 ms
back1.jpg
421 ms
tech-banbg.jpg
422 ms
tech1-ban.png
973 ms
tech2-ban.png
989 ms
welcome-pic2-350x439.jpg
570 ms
visionban-400x290.jpg
597 ms
missionban1.jpg
590 ms
management2.jpg
561 ms
brick-wall.jpg
850 ms
dark-background.jpg
771 ms
UAnF6lSK1JNc1tqTiG8pNALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
38 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T88DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
39 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAricDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
38 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-k8DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
39 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
38 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12b8DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
39 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaI8DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
38 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
39 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
39 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
697 ms
skin.css
161 ms
blank.gif
71 ms
skin.png
71 ms
evoplus.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
evoplus.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
evoplus.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Evoplus.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Evoplus.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
evoplus.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Evoplus. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: