2.8 sec in total
720 ms
1.6 sec
505 ms
Welcome to eweb.co.in homepage info - get ready to check EWeb best content right away, or after learning these important things about eweb.co.in
EWeb Tech - Website Design Company Mumbai offering Web design, website development and search engine optimization services/ promoting business, business. Call us at +91 8080127640.
Visit eweb.co.inWe analyzed Eweb.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 720 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
eweb.co.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
71/100
10%
Value4.6 s
35/100
25%
Value5.3 s
57/100
10%
Value510 ms
57/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.7 s
29/100
10%
720 ms
122 ms
127 ms
129 ms
18 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Eweb.co.in, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Speakpipe.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (720 ms) belongs to the original domain Eweb.co.in.
Page size can be reduced by 76.0 kB (3%)
2.8 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Eweb.co.in main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.2 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EWeb images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.5 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eweb.co.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.1 kB or 32% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (37%)
59
37
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EWeb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eweb.co.in
720 ms
bootstrap.css
122 ms
main.css
127 ms
font-awesome.min.css
129 ms
css
18 ms
css
34 ms
modernizr.custom.js
128 ms
jquery.min.js
15 ms
scrolltopcontrol.js
126 ms
jquery.min.js
20 ms
stickynote.js
143 ms
api.js
44 ms
modal.css
182 ms
modal.js
192 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
25 ms
bootstrap.min.js
203 ms
main.js
201 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
207 ms
imagesloaded.js
247 ms
classie.js
250 ms
AnimOnScroll.js
249 ms
jqueryscripttop.css
42 ms
2y92xrg9a7jx0uljjvlxgqagux4e5sdw.js
172 ms
lets-talk.png
122 ms
icon1.png
128 ms
header-bg1.jpg
340 ms
post20.jpg
287 ms
post18.jpg
207 ms
post19.jpg
323 ms
post21.jpg
324 ms
post22.jpg
293 ms
post04.jpg
268 ms
post07.jpg
329 ms
post08.jpg
350 ms
post09.jpg
356 ms
post24.jpg
440 ms
post25.jpg
502 ms
post26.jpg
444 ms
post27.jpg
410 ms
post28.jpg
474 ms
post29.jpg
536 ms
post10.jpg
471 ms
post11.jpg
557 ms
post12.jpg
506 ms
post13.jpg
533 ms
post14.jpg
536 ms
post15.jpg
563 ms
1.png
566 ms
hover.gif
593 ms
2.png
596 ms
3.png
596 ms
asset_composer.js
80 ms
4.png
583 ms
5.png
577 ms
6.png
578 ms
7.png
562 ms
8.png
565 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
30 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff
31 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
30 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff
31 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff
47 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff
48 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
565 ms
asterisk_orange.png
558 ms
up.png
565 ms
2y92xrg9a7jx0uljjvlxgqagux4e5sdw.js
406 ms
speakpipe-widget-v2.css
78 ms
eweb.co.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
eweb.co.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
eweb.co.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eweb.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eweb.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eweb.co.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EWeb. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: