3.1 sec in total
69 ms
2.7 sec
353 ms
Click here to check amazing Excellentchoicept content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about excellentchoicept.com
Visit excellentchoicept.comWe analyzed Excellentchoicept.com page load time and found that the first response time was 69 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
excellentchoicept.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value14.1 s
0/100
25%
Value10.5 s
7/100
10%
Value880 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.202
61/100
15%
Value16.1 s
6/100
10%
69 ms
950 ms
11 ms
15 ms
29 ms
Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Excellentchoicept.com, 78% (79 requests) were made to Motionptg.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (950 ms) relates to the external source Motionptg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 279.0 kB (23%)
1.2 MB
955.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Excellentchoicept.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 468.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 84.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Excellentchoicept images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 89.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.9 kB or 19% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 80.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Excellentchoicept.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 80.6 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (86%)
81
11
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Excellentchoicept. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 38 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
excellentchoicept.com
69 ms
950 ms
style.css
11 ms
owl.theme.default.css
15 ms
owl.carousel.css
29 ms
animate.css
34 ms
single-post.css
30 ms
style.min.css
30 ms
blocks.css
35 ms
czicons.css
34 ms
simple-banner.css
50 ms
style.css
44 ms
style.css
50 ms
core.css
44 ms
css
124 ms
css
132 ms
share.css
42 ms
codevzplus.css
40 ms
vc_addons_kit.css
99 ms
animate.min.css
55 ms
js_composer_front_custom.css
62 ms
elementor.css
56 ms
ubermenu.min.css
56 ms
minimal.css
59 ms
all.min.css
94 ms
v4-shims.min.css
93 ms
all.min.css
87 ms
jquery.min.js
87 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
122 ms
owl.carousel2-min.js
124 ms
script-min.js
121 ms
rbtools.min.js
126 ms
rs6.min.js
127 ms
simple-banner.js
123 ms
jq-sticky-anything.min.js
127 ms
gambit-smoothscroll-min.js
126 ms
scripts.js
125 ms
bundle.js
121 ms
v4-shims.min.css
124 ms
all.min.css
289 ms
2_buttons.css
195 ms
button.css
195 ms
stylish_list.css
189 ms
separator.css
177 ms
rs6.css
174 ms
stickThis.js
175 ms
codevz-menu.min.js
257 ms
custom.js
252 ms
sticky.js
252 ms
codevzplus.js
246 ms
share.js
244 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
240 ms
lib.js
245 ms
shortcode.js
242 ms
ubermenu.min.js
240 ms
search.js
234 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
233 ms
separator.js
231 ms
script.js
231 ms
gtm.js
817 ms
gtm.js
917 ms
fbevents.js
740 ms
polyfill.min.js
891 ms
montefiorehero.jpg
712 ms
MOTION-PT-logo-w400.png
709 ms
Museo100.otf
581 ms
Museo%20100.otf
580 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
581 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
649 ms
Museo700.otf
579 ms
Museo500.otf
581 ms
czicons.woff
646 ms
fa-v4compatibility.ttf
581 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
645 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
651 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
652 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
654 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
655 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
530 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
528 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
627 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
530 ms
style.css
69 ms
core-laptop.css
113 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
173 ms
MOTION-PT-logo-1021-400.png
55 ms
exellent-choice-w.png
56 ms
js
99 ms
quant.js
96 ms
analytics.js
150 ms
js
171 ms
core-tablet.css
60 ms
core-mobile.css
25 ms
collect
40 ms
collect
32 ms
codevzplus-tablet.css
11 ms
collect
161 ms
codevzplus-mobile.css
93 ms
45 ms
ga-audiences
36 ms
20 ms
excellentchoicept.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
excellentchoicept.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
excellentchoicept.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Excellentchoicept.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Excellentchoicept.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
excellentchoicept.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Excellentchoicept. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: