24.6 sec in total
712 ms
23.3 sec
659 ms
Click here to check amazing Exitscript content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about exitscript.com
Visit exitscript.comWe analyzed Exitscript.com page load time and found that the first response time was 712 ms and then it took 23.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
exitscript.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value15.0 s
0/100
25%
Value13.0 s
2/100
10%
Value440 ms
63/100
30%
Value0.009
100/100
15%
Value15.0 s
8/100
10%
712 ms
1448 ms
231 ms
1497 ms
1508 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Exitscript.com, 71% (70 requests) were made to Capiac.org.cn and 4% (4 requests) were made to Wlovebaidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Exitscript.com.
Page size can be reduced by 135.4 kB (1%)
14.3 MB
14.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Exitscript.com main page is 14.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 14.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.8 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 72.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Exitscript images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 28% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Exitscript.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.3 kB or 42% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (3%)
94
91
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Exitscript. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
exitscript.com
712 ms
www.exitscript.com
1448 ms
jquery.3.5.2.min.t.js
231 ms
animation.css
1497 ms
css.css
1508 ms
responsive.css
1500 ms
bootstrap-icons.css
1503 ms
index.html
495 ms
js-sdk-pro.min.js
350 ms
logo-80px.gif
976 ms
search.png
261 ms
logo_440x140.v.4.png
1345 ms
6623f0600bad.png
1294 ms
322c1422bfcdccb.png
1293 ms
sb_jt.png
1494 ms
9805867e5741b22.jpg
2191 ms
25724e5f059b3d4.png
1501 ms
5e41acb68ca7e6a.png
1503 ms
fa8a7a8957af.png
1508 ms
669791ee8e99851.png
1506 ms
aea5e96447921df.png
1727 ms
05d3db2c5edfd4e.png
2434 ms
4e08912673e7d0b.png
2436 ms
89436fcce26da76.png
2451 ms
152b4abcfcab0e.png
2453 ms
33e300452156858.png
2748 ms
9559b2cc46b6d.png
2661 ms
5ea5abd94b7cadf.png
2901 ms
209e1afb48b41b7.png
2905 ms
559c1033021ab66.png
2699 ms
afbbd4e89d1a468.png
2696 ms
b77a58daf629e6b.png
2910 ms
10f1c7949985896.png
2939 ms
e62eec0134966fc.png
2944 ms
71fef3afb47c.png
2981 ms
0580851f97dce83.png
3135 ms
9d66623966c0b75.png
3146 ms
378d6a3335605fb.png
3152 ms
9269d62a9bfc0f5.png
3181 ms
a97a91e7c8e20ab.png
3192 ms
ffa82d87f1dd.png
3222 ms
c6fd7240eff8b0c.png
3371 ms
6ec89463a5ac89.png
3379 ms
a1c8552a227390.png
3387 ms
collect
487 ms
1.jpg
3003 ms
2.gif
2844 ms
3.jpg
3103 ms
4.jpg
3127 ms
ac7dc52d60b5bbf.png
2163 ms
c6f6891bf72f550.png
2169 ms
221f4e1316d98f0.png
2200 ms
13db03038187b20.png
11985 ms
fc7946ea3790.png
19577 ms
81cf46f013ef.png
9841 ms
8de663f2c6f143.jpg
3694 ms
c205d3eb2a56886.png
6788 ms
bf0af9c3c35b6c4.png
6637 ms
00f1f4e5bc5eede.png
3939 ms
df4a9752550c248.png
4151 ms
b65df1c9035d99c.png
4362 ms
54b39065e2a6118.png
4575 ms
618c9688f91f1eb.png
4787 ms
a5139f912949bb3.png
5024 ms
ef7942802139bed.png
5236 ms
3834aaa5b2704.png
5462 ms
5451ccb4efe83fb.png
5694 ms
446b454985fc41.png
5907 ms
65676bc6f657c4f.jpg
2316 ms
33f64010a98be2f.jpg
2324 ms
23a641b98e63d2d.jpg
2283 ms
bootstrap-icons.woff
2173 ms
382bd8e2977ac50.jpg
2173 ms
bf93c4bdc592a.jpg
2202 ms
903d64edfdf743e.jpg
2337 ms
92a360966e9a5.jpg
2346 ms
23e5c8b642b25db.jpg
2134 ms
c4497c058f0e8ab.png
1718 ms
7beffb6f5f5ef6.jpg
1477 ms
8f11e248687b3ca.png
1509 ms
38465b26edf39c7.png
1625 ms
10a56cdbc31b195.png
1635 ms
401a27e0e0d089b.png
1452 ms
9aeb87aa8ae32be.png
1454 ms
d59d183c1f540f8.png
1698 ms
2b88b1ee9613421.png
1893 ms
b4f19616710821b.png
1649 ms
806a48e867c6645.png
2094 ms
6e9831f477dde13.png
1438 ms
5bc7f4567e03681.png
1454 ms
07cd548eedc0c45.png
1640 ms
15a7d7b6b87f127.png
1648 ms
a8bfa50a017993c.png
1500 ms
0a0f98b8a92c54d.png
1637 ms
so.png
1667 ms
hy.png
1688 ms
sb_bg.png
1684 ms
jt.png
1650 ms
bf.png
1644 ms
exitscript.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
exitscript.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
exitscript.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
ZH
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Exitscript.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Exitscript.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
exitscript.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Exitscript. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: