Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    43% of websites

expense-reduction.co.uk

Cost Optimisation Specialists | Expense Reduction Analysts

Page Load Speed

9.8 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

7.8 sec

Page Rendered

709 ms

expense-reduction.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit expense-reduction.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Expense Reduction content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about expense-reduction.co.uk

Delivering Value Through Insight, Expense Reduction Analysts is able to unlock your business potential, helping your business to reduce costs and achieve its goals with our global network of experts. ...

Visit expense-reduction.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Expense-reduction.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 8.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

expense-reduction.co.uk performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,640 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.232

54/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.9 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

expense-reduction.co.uk

1318 ms

css

29 ms

news-box-layout.min.css

88 ms

styles.css

133 ms

magnific-popup.css

135 ms

Our browser made a total of 112 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Expense-reduction.co.uk, 13% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Databroker.coremotives.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Expense-reduction.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (47%)

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Expense-reduction.co.uk main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 49.9 kB

  • Original 62.4 kB
  • After minification 59.6 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 200.4 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Expense Reduction images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 425.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 727.0 kB

  • Original 831.2 kB
  • After minification 778.2 kB
  • After compression 104.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Expense-reduction.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 727.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (58%)

Requests Now

96

After Optimization

40

The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Expense Reduction. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

expense-reduction.co.uk accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

SEO Factors

expense-reduction.co.uk SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Expense-reduction.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Expense-reduction.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Expense Reduction. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: