Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    43% of websites

exportpages.no

B2B-Platform Exportpages - produkt- og leverandørsøk

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

298 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

296 ms

exportpages.no screenshot

About Website

Welcome to exportpages.no homepage info - get ready to check Exportpages best content right away, or after learning these important things about exportpages.no

B2B-Platform Exportpages ➦ Online-eksportmessen på 32 språk er mer enn bare en digital adressebok! Produsenter ✔ Leverandører ✔ og tjenesteleverandører ✔ Finn ut om Exportpages og få verdifulle nye ko...

Visit exportpages.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Exportpages.no page load time and found that the first response time was 298 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

exportpages.no performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.7 s

56/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

exportpages.no

298 ms

648 ms

css

60 ms

lib.css

334 ms

theme.css

421 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Exportpages.no, 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Exportpages.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 530.3 kB (71%)

Content Size

746.6 kB

After Optimization

216.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Exportpages.no main page is 746.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 568.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 40.0 kB

  • Original 51.6 kB
  • After minification 49.2 kB
  • After compression 11.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 105.8 kB
  • After minification 105.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Exportpages images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 490.2 kB

  • Original 568.2 kB
  • After minification 563.9 kB
  • After compression 78.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Exportpages.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 490.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (67%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Exportpages. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

exportpages.no accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

exportpages.no best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

exportpages.no SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NO

  • Language Claimed

    NO

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Exportpages.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Exportpages.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Exportpages. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: