3.7 sec in total
103 ms
2.9 sec
655 ms
Click here to check amazing Eye Candy Delafield content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eyecandydelafield.com
Our little optical boutique in beautiful Downtown Delafield has blossomed to house a total of 6 Board Certified Opticians, over 25 independent...
Visit eyecandydelafield.comWe analyzed Eyecandydelafield.com page load time and found that the first response time was 103 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
eyecandydelafield.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value4.1 s
48/100
25%
Value12.2 s
3/100
10%
Value2,420 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.33
34/100
15%
Value24.1 s
0/100
10%
103 ms
213 ms
179 ms
195 ms
189 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Eyecandydelafield.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Eyecandydelafield.com.
Page size can be reduced by 113.2 kB (5%)
2.2 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Eyecandydelafield.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 97.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eye Candy Delafield images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 10.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eyecandydelafield.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (83%)
75
13
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eye Candy Delafield. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eyecandydelafield.com
103 ms
eyecandydelafield.com
213 ms
icomoon-the7-font.min.css
179 ms
all.min.css
195 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
189 ms
custom-frontend.min.css
214 ms
swiper.min.css
221 ms
post-11.css
193 ms
custom-pro-frontend.min.css
402 ms
uael-frontend.min.css
414 ms
global.css
385 ms
post-4.css
367 ms
post-2900.css
393 ms
post-752.css
397 ms
main.min.css
610 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.css
570 ms
post-type.min.css
595 ms
css-vars.css
601 ms
custom.css
584 ms
media.css
619 ms
the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css
767 ms
post-type-dynamic.css
763 ms
style.css
773 ms
elementor-global.min.css
798 ms
the7-icon-box-widget.min.css
843 ms
the7-filter-decorations-base.min.css
785 ms
the7-simple-common.min.css
938 ms
the7-simple-posts.min.css
781 ms
the7-icon-box-grid-widget.min.css
948 ms
fontawesome.min.css
964 ms
brands.min.css
998 ms
solid.min.css
1010 ms
jquery.min.js
1024 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1114 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
1164 ms
classic-10_7.css
1163 ms
mc-validate.js
1244 ms
css
34 ms
the7-sticky-effects.min.css
1248 ms
rs6.css
1047 ms
main.min.js
1155 ms
rbtools.min.js
1178 ms
rs6.min.js
973 ms
legacy.min.js
1173 ms
jquery-mousewheel.min.js
1179 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.js
1065 ms
post-type.min.js
932 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
1109 ms
forms.js
1131 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1158 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1164 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1035 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1038 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1089 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1107 ms
hooks.min.js
1147 ms
i18n.min.js
1156 ms
frontend.min.js
1075 ms
waypoints.min.js
1072 ms
core.min.js
1092 ms
frontend.min.js
1106 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1156 ms
frontend-common.min.js
1039 ms
jquery-sticky.min.js
1137 ms
sticky-effects.min.js
1051 ms
EC-logo-orange-e1651250263104.png
812 ms
EC-logo-orange-e1651250263104-1024x312.png
930 ms
Nina-2.png
1030 ms
Lafont-womens-soft-metallic-blue-1024x1024.png
1144 ms
big-IMG_6840.jpg
994 ms
Lindberg-n.o.w.-orange.png
1111 ms
jfkids_19-683x1024.jpg
1040 ms
IMG_6108-1024x683.jpg
1168 ms
AeV-SK-4.jpg
1092 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1176 ms
embed
304 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1181 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1241 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1248 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1127 ms
icomoon-the7-font.ttf
1195 ms
blob-scene-haikei-8.svg
1216 ms
js
48 ms
eyecandydelafield.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
eyecandydelafield.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
eyecandydelafield.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eyecandydelafield.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eyecandydelafield.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eyecandydelafield.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eye Candy Delafield. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: