6.8 sec in total
1.9 sec
4.6 sec
229 ms
Welcome to ezmail.com homepage info - get ready to check EZMAIL best content for Australia right away, or after learning these important things about ezmail.com
Since 1996, EZMAIL services has provided direct mail and multi-channel marketing services to customers throughout the United States. Reach all of your customers through digital (email and web based) a...
Visit ezmail.comWe analyzed Ezmail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
ezmail.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value14.5 s
0/100
10%
Value16.6 s
0/100
25%
Value16.9 s
0/100
10%
Value660 ms
45/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value30.0 s
0/100
10%
1909 ms
24 ms
81 ms
126 ms
182 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Ezmail.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to I-t.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Ezmail.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (76%)
1.6 MB
390.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Ezmail.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, EZMAIL needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.9 kB or 51% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 836.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 836.4 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 379.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ezmail.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 379.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (74%)
47
12
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EZMAIL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ezmail.com
1909 ms
css
24 ms
sem-external-links.css
81 ms
layerslider.css
126 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
182 ms
css
14 ms
style-lazyload.min.css
86 ms
style.css
86 ms
font-awesome.min.css
174 ms
stylesheet.min.css
506 ms
style_dynamic.php
753 ms
responsive.min.css
278 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.php
820 ms
js_composer_front.css
400 ms
custom_css.php
873 ms
default.min.css
475 ms
style.css
531 ms
jquery.js
751 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
582 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
749 ms
greensock.js
828 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
872 ms
html5.js
828 ms
lazyload-all.min.js
406 ms
qode-like.js
471 ms
plugins.js
1122 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
694 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
497 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
543 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
622 ms
default_dynamic.php
1087 ms
default.min.js
778 ms
custom_js.php
1274 ms
comment-reply.min.js
694 ms
js_composer_front.js
1005 ms
wp-embed.min.js
783 ms
style.css
775 ms
ezmlogo411x902.gif
297 ms
external.png
292 ms
logo_white.png
290 ms
logo_black.png
290 ms
clock.gif
294 ms
bills.gif
291 ms
aspirin.gif
293 ms
signad.gif
293 ms
piwik.js
1019 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
426 ms
logo.png
40 ms
ezmail.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ezmail.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ezmail.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ezmail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ezmail.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ezmail.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EZMAIL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: