2 sec in total
123 ms
1.8 sec
73 ms
Click here to check amazing Nuclear Energy Tech Review content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com
Energy Tech Review is a print and digital magazine that aggregates the brightest of minds, expert opinions, latest energy technologies news, analyses, and argument about the critical issues that exist...
Visit nuclearenergy.energytechreview.comWe analyzed Nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 123 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value4.6 s
34/100
25%
Value5.3 s
59/100
10%
Value2,150 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
123 ms
583 ms
335 ms
282 ms
289 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com, 45% (27 requests) were made to Energytechreview.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (726 ms) relates to the external source Energytechreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 160.6 kB (18%)
891.9 kB
731.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com main page is 891.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 674.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nuclear Energy Tech Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 62.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 50.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.6 kB or 55% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (76%)
50
12
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nuclear Energy Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com
123 ms
nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com
583 ms
bootstrap.css
335 ms
font-awesome.min.css
282 ms
animate.css
289 ms
owl.carousel.css
292 ms
owl.theme.default.css
292 ms
normalize.css
293 ms
slicknav.min.css
342 ms
style1.css
59 ms
main.css
351 ms
responsive.css
359 ms
modernizr-3.5.0.min.js
361 ms
css
41 ms
css
53 ms
css
58 ms
js
94 ms
gpt.js
106 ms
adsbygoogle.js
132 ms
element.js
90 ms
new_region.css
356 ms
jquery.min.js
607 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
490 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
607 ms
jquery.slicknav.min.js
607 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
606 ms
main.js
607 ms
smart-sticky.js
606 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.js
725 ms
jquery_cookie.js
726 ms
custom.js
725 ms
jquery.easy-ticker.js
725 ms
analytics.js
225 ms
gpt.js
342 ms
atrk.js
188 ms
Final-Logo.png
222 ms
load.gif
362 ms
x.png
341 ms
linkedin_cirr.png
341 ms
pubads_impl.js
163 ms
show_ads_impl.js
522 ms
zrt_lookup_nohtml.html
242 ms
jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zE.woff
152 ms
jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q10.woff
171 ms
jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q10.woff
177 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtU.woff
143 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
142 ms
collect
126 ms
css
70 ms
font-awesome.min.css
95 ms
ads
142 ms
container.html
51 ms
js
113 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
67 ms
icon-up.png
98 ms
12456792865918335218
149 ms
icon.png
147 ms
abg_lite.js
149 ms
window_focus.js
148 ms
ufs_web_display.js
55 ms
nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nuclear Energy Tech Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: