Tools & Wizards About Us
nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review Magazine

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

131 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

88 ms

nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Nuclear Energy Tech Review content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review is a print and digital magazine sharing expert opinions, the latest energy tech news, and analyses on key issues in energy tech industry.

Visit nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 131 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

53/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value870 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.5 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com

131 ms

nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com

496 ms

bootstrap.css

324 ms

bootsatrap.min_custom.css

272 ms

font-awesome.min.css

275 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com, 47% (29 requests) were made to Energytechreview.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (699 ms) relates to the external source Energytechreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 452.1 kB (38%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

729.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 807.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 67.1 kB

  • Original 86.3 kB
  • After minification 85.3 kB
  • After compression 19.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 71.3 kB
  • After minification 65.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nuclear Energy Tech Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 204.3 kB

  • Original 807.2 kB
  • After minification 803.7 kB
  • After compression 602.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 204.3 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 174.5 kB

  • Original 216.8 kB
  • After minification 182.9 kB
  • After compression 42.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 174.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (74%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nuclear Energy Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com

nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com

131 ms

nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com

nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com

496 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

324 ms

bootsatrap.min_custom.css

bootsatrap.min_custom.css

272 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

275 ms

animate.css

animate.css

273 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

281 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

281 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

335 ms

slicknav.min.css

slicknav.min.css

333 ms

style1.css

style1.css

78 ms

main.css

main.css

337 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

346 ms

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

348 ms

css

css

46 ms

css

css

77 ms

css

css

77 ms

js

js

83 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

51 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

77 ms

element.js

element.js

69 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

505 ms

ad.js

ad.js

510 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

36 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

550 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

504 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

504 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

509 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

504 ms

main.js

main.js

699 ms

smart-sticky.js

smart-sticky.js

698 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

698 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

698 ms

custom.js

custom.js

698 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

698 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

189 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

187 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

114 ms

Final-Logo.png

Final-Logo.png

139 ms

load.gif

load.gif

420 ms

x.png

x.png

397 ms

Artboard_9.jpg

Artboard_9.jpg

334 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

418 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

131 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

146 ms

jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zE.woff

jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zE.woff

118 ms

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q10.woff

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q10.woff

198 ms

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q10.woff

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q10.woff

226 ms

css

css

170 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

203 ms

jsonp.js

jsonp.js

151 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtU.woff

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtU.woff

163 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

230 ms

collect

collect

147 ms

sep_img.png

sep_img.png

107 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

69 ms

ads

ads

69 ms

atb.gif

atb.gif

99 ms

energytechreview_top.jfif

energytechreview_top.jfif

16 ms

js

js

69 ms

icon-up.png

icon-up.png

64 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

61 ms

Accessibility Review

nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nuclearenergy.energytechreview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nuclear Energy Tech Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: