10.3 sec in total
240 ms
9.8 sec
188 ms
Click here to check amazing Tools Email Checker content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tools.email-checker.com
Email Checker offers a real-time API and bulk validation for list cleaning. Verify email addresses online easily with a self service verification solution.
Visit tools.email-checker.comWe analyzed Tools.email-checker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 240 ms and then it took 10 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Tools.email-checker.com rating and web reputation
tools.email-checker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value4.6 s
34/100
25%
Value6.7 s
35/100
10%
Value480 ms
60/100
30%
Value0.139
79/100
15%
Value11.2 s
20/100
10%
240 ms
2166 ms
1850 ms
1917 ms
1952 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tools.email-checker.com, 75% (50 requests) were made to Tools.verifyemailaddress.io and 6% (4 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.8 sec) relates to the external source Tools.verifyemailaddress.io.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (75%)
1.9 MB
493.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Tools.email-checker.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 84.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.7 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 477 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tools Email Checker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 212.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tools.email-checker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 212.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (78%)
51
11
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tools Email Checker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tools.email-checker.com
240 ms
tools.verifyemailaddress.io
2166 ms
WebResource.axd
1850 ms
WebResource.axd
1917 ms
WebResource.axd
1952 ms
WebResource.axd
1949 ms
WebResource.axd
1960 ms
WebResource.axd
1954 ms
WebResource.axd
4798 ms
WebResource.axd
4801 ms
WebResource.axd
4933 ms
logo2.png
1974 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
5031 ms
WebForms.js
1969 ms
WebUIValidation.js
1996 ms
ScriptResource.axd
4985 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
5199 ms
bootstrap.min.js
57 ms
jqueryui
6694 ms
jqueryvalidate
6655 ms
themespecific
6676 ms
modernizr
6679 ms
siteCommon
6721 ms
cookieconsent.latest.min.js
100 ms
jquery.lazy.min.js
65 ms
colorbox
6770 ms
addthis_widget.js
144 ms
walkingHippo-96x40.gif
1786 ms
DeleteHS.png
1815 ms
delete.gif
1813 ms
Filter2HS.png
1813 ms
excel16x16.gif
1817 ms
word16x16.gif
1856 ms
acrobat16x16.gif
1856 ms
logo-foot-120x120.png
1856 ms
WebResource.axd
1599 ms
WebResource.axd
1598 ms
WebResource.axd
1615 ms
bootstrap.min.css
9 ms
css
56 ms
font-awesome.min.css
24 ms
site
163 ms
black-tie.min.css
108 ms
colorbox
129 ms
map-img.png
206 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
168 ms
BlackTie-Regular-webfont.woff
257 ms
BlackTie-Light-webfont.woff
221 ms
BlackTie-Bold-webfont.woff
221 ms
BlackTie-Solid-webfont.woff
240 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
257 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
258 ms
prum.min.js
248 ms
analytics.js
249 ms
WebResource.axd
133 ms
WebResource.axd
133 ms
overlay.png
131 ms
BlackTie-Light-webfont.ttf
61 ms
BlackTie-Bold-webfont.ttf
78 ms
BlackTie-Solid-webfont.ttf
57 ms
collect
16 ms
collect
61 ms
BlackTie-Light-webfont.svg
61 ms
BlackTie-Bold-webfont.svg
58 ms
BlackTie-Solid-webfont.svg
56 ms
300lo.json
48 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
25 ms
tools.email-checker.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tools.email-checker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
tools.email-checker.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tools.email-checker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tools.email-checker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tools.email-checker.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tools Email Checker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: