Tools & Wizards About Us
wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 78

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    39% of websites

wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review Magazine

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

133 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

192 ms

wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Wind Energy Tech Europe Review best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review is a print and digital magazine sharing expert opinions, the latest energy tech news, and analyses on key issues in energy tech industry.

Visit wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,560 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.24

52/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com

133 ms

wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com

591 ms

bootstrap.css

325 ms

bootsatrap.min_custom.css

267 ms

font-awesome.min.css

270 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com, 49% (40 requests) were made to Energytechreview.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (595 ms) relates to the external source Energytechreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 319.3 kB (30%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

756.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 382.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 82.0 kB

  • Original 105.4 kB
  • After minification 104.4 kB
  • After compression 23.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 369.9 kB
  • After minification 362.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wind Energy Tech Europe Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 55.3 kB

  • Original 382.0 kB
  • After minification 378.5 kB
  • After compression 326.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 55.3 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 174.8 kB

  • Original 218.4 kB
  • After minification 184.5 kB
  • After compression 43.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 174.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (65%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wind Energy Tech Europe Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com

wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com

133 ms

wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com

wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com

591 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

325 ms

bootsatrap.min_custom.css

bootsatrap.min_custom.css

267 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

270 ms

animate.css

animate.css

284 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

281 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

286 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

330 ms

slicknav.min.css

slicknav.min.css

330 ms

style1.css

style1.css

148 ms

main.css

main.css

346 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

344 ms

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

351 ms

css

css

59 ms

css

css

83 ms

css

css

102 ms

js

js

95 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

85 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

92 ms

element.js

element.js

82 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

465 ms

ad.js

ad.js

466 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

48 ms

style.css

style.css

133 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

139 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

18 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.js

jQuery.verticalCarousel.js

186 ms

jquery.flipbox.css

jquery.flipbox.css

188 ms

cube_slider.css

cube_slider.css

193 ms

jquery.flipbox.js

jquery.flipbox.js

193 ms

jquery-3.3.1.slim.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.slim.min.js

24 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

526 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

395 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

393 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

394 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

392 ms

main.js

main.js

525 ms

smart-sticky.js

smart-sticky.js

525 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

525 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

525 ms

custom.js

custom.js

524 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

595 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

110 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

231 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

84 ms

Final-Logo.png

Final-Logo.png

98 ms

load.gif

load.gif

300 ms

450x308_sn12.jpg

450x308_sn12.jpg

300 ms

450x308_t173.jpg

450x308_t173.jpg

300 ms

z7v61Untitled-4.jpg

z7v61Untitled-4.jpg

299 ms

450x308_FDK2.jpg

450x308_FDK2.jpg

300 ms

450x308_fCz8.jpg

450x308_fCz8.jpg

352 ms

450x308_8F03.jpg

450x308_8F03.jpg

352 ms

lbeu7Award-Logo.jpg

lbeu7Award-Logo.jpg

353 ms

vxsv8Award-Logo.jpg

vxsv8Award-Logo.jpg

354 ms

450x308_vq2x.jpg

450x308_vq2x.jpg

461 ms

450x308_l3JO.jpg

450x308_l3JO.jpg

473 ms

450x308_SU03.jpg

450x308_SU03.jpg

411 ms

x.png

x.png

413 ms

Artboard_9.jpg

Artboard_9.jpg

95 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

96 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

63 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

151 ms

jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zI.ttf

jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zI.ttf

132 ms

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q14.ttf

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q14.ttf

200 ms

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q14.ttf

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q14.ttf

203 ms

css

css

171 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

187 ms

jsonp.js

jsonp.js

167 ms

collect

collect

139 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

105 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

205 ms

sep_img.png

sep_img.png

185 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

63 ms

ads

ads

71 ms

js

js

80 ms

atb.gif

atb.gif

78 ms

energytechreview_top.jfif

energytechreview_top.jfif

30 ms

icon-up.png

icon-up.png

63 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

62 ms

Accessibility Review

wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com SEO score

78

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wind-energy-tech-europe.energytechreview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wind Energy Tech Europe Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: