13.8 sec in total
5.3 sec
7.9 sec
619 ms
Welcome to ae.fxcomparison.com homepage info - get ready to check Ae Fxcomparison best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about ae.fxcomparison.com
Visit ae.fxcomparison.comWe analyzed Ae.fxcomparison.com page load time and found that the first response time was 5.3 sec and then it took 8.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
ae.fxcomparison.com performance score
5287 ms
890 ms
476 ms
267 ms
379 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Ae.fxcomparison.com, 20% (12 requests) were made to Ad.fxcomparison.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Ww2.fxcomparison.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Ae.fxcomparison.com.
Page size can be reduced by 250.8 kB (63%)
400.6 kB
149.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Ae.fxcomparison.com main page is 400.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 188.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 92.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.2 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 80.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ae Fxcomparison needs image optimization as it can save up to 80.9 kB or 43% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 56.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 56.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ae.fxcomparison.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (60%)
58
23
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ae Fxcomparison. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ae.fxcomparison.com
5287 ms
style.css
890 ms
jquery-1.3.2.min.js
476 ms
jcookie.js
267 ms
jcarousellite.js
379 ms
superfish.js
405 ms
global.js
467 ms
loopedslider.js
499 ms
scrolltopcontrol.js
503 ms
icon-search.gif
126 ms
small-twitter.gif
108 ms
small-facebook.png
104 ms
small-forum.png
128 ms
small-email.png
173 ms
timthumb.php
1227 ms
timthumb.php
3734 ms
timthumb.php
1561 ms
timthumb.php
683 ms
timthumb.php
2517 ms
timthumb.php
1349 ms
timthumb.php
2168 ms
ajs.php
540 ms
timthumb.php
1331 ms
timthumb.php
1473 ms
timthumb.php
1486 ms
timthumb.php
1670 ms
forex_trading.jpg
568 ms
menu.gif
1127 ms
dot.gif
1143 ms
slidernav.png
1235 ms
lg.php
235 ms
hatch.gif
1256 ms
ajs.php
334 ms
468x60.gif
143 ms
rss.png
900 ms
bg-title.jpg
1146 ms
lg.php
133 ms
ajs.php
176 ms
B6396756.114076039;sz=100x33;ord=[timestamp]
44 ms
gltfx.png
267 ms
icon-bullet.gif
765 ms
lg.php
175 ms
ajs.php
224 ms
300x250.gif
107 ms
lg.php
173 ms
24option-Logo-EN-100x33.jpg
230 ms
lidar.js
105 ms
sbhK2lTE.js
74 ms
ajs.php
227 ms
cTrvNaRi.html
44 ms
Rf2QnA3orEL6Eez56HJgxRuQ77qJyxbefnbSCBE0iUQ.js
54 ms
120x600.gif
95 ms
lg.php
162 ms
ajs.php
165 ms
ww2.fxcomparison.com
275 ms
ww2.fxcomparison.com
295 ms
ww2.fxcomparison.com
287 ms
ww2.fxcomparison.com
270 ms
lg.php
181 ms
go-up.png
146 ms
ae.fxcomparison.com SEO score
AR
AR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ae.fxcomparison.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Arabic is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ae.fxcomparison.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ae.fxcomparison.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ae Fxcomparison. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: