Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    43% of websites

better.future-processing.com

Better Future — Artificial Intelligence is the key to a Better Future

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

404 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

799 ms

better.future-processing.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to better.future-processing.com homepage info - get ready to check Better Future Processing best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about better.future-processing.com

The market nowadays is filled with solutions aimed at not only optimising our actions, but also adding a completely new dimension to them. We believe that thanks to new technologies a better future is...

Visit better.future-processing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Better.future-processing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 404 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

better.future-processing.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value610 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

better.future-processing.com

404 ms

better.future-processing.com

463 ms

gtm.js

64 ms

app.cac1bcb764b7635c1f14089931ba3ea0.css

253 ms

manifest.17490b280f1afd2d1291.js

275 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Better.future-processing.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 356.0 kB (42%)

Content Size

841.8 kB

After Optimization

485.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Better.future-processing.com main page is 841.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 659.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 107.4 kB

  • Original 148.4 kB
  • After minification 147.8 kB
  • After compression 41.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 246.3 kB

  • Original 659.8 kB
  • After minification 413.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Better Future Processing needs image optimization as it can save up to 246.3 kB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 12.7 kB
  • After minification 12.7 kB
  • After compression 10.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Better.future-processing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (22%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Better Future Processing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

better.future-processing.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

better.future-processing.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

better.future-processing.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Better.future-processing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Better.future-processing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Better Future Processing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: