1.3 sec in total
227 ms
948 ms
92 ms
Welcome to chat.flightradar24.com homepage info - get ready to check Chat Flightradar24 best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about chat.flightradar24.com
Flightradar24 is the best live flight tracker that shows air traffic in real time. Best coverage and cool features!
Visit chat.flightradar24.comWe analyzed Chat.flightradar24.com page load time and found that the first response time was 227 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
chat.flightradar24.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value24.2 s
0/100
25%
Value17.4 s
0/100
10%
Value152,480 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.689
7/100
15%
Value177.4 s
0/100
10%
227 ms
195 ms
55 ms
105 ms
68 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Chat.flightradar24.com, 59% (39 requests) were made to Flightradar24.com and 15% (10 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (315 ms) relates to the external source Match.adsrvr.org.
Page size can be reduced by 422.6 kB (35%)
1.2 MB
801.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Chat.flightradar24.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 486.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 360.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 360.0 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chat Flightradar24 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 17.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chat.flightradar24.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.5 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (70%)
64
19
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chat Flightradar24. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
chat.flightradar24.com
227 ms
www.flightradar24.com
195 ms
jquery.ui.slider.css
55 ms
font-awesome.min.css
105 ms
bootstrap.min.css
68 ms
screen_new.css
54 ms
important-banner.css
53 ms
ccpa.css
50 ms
nav-top.css
73 ms
view-menu.css
104 ms
timeout_modal.css
106 ms
toastr.min.css
106 ms
flickity.min.css
102 ms
map.css
102 ms
191933-126936749825897.js
74 ms
gpt.js
118 ms
analytics.js
72 ms
jquery.min.js
96 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
143 ms
bootstrap.min.js
117 ms
moment.min.js
96 ms
moment-duration-format.min.js
104 ms
URI.min.js
104 ms
angular.min.js
175 ms
angular-resource.min.js
174 ms
toastr.min.js
142 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
142 ms
jquery.ui.selectmenu.js
103 ms
dexie.min.js
141 ms
highcharts.js
173 ms
jquery.history.min.js
140 ms
js
94 ms
main.648e971f6977ff0bd4fc.bundle.js
291 ms
main.3a7d9006b5206a043875.css
170 ms
displaySideView.css
172 ms
delays.css
171 ms
promoSlider.css
135 ms
feature-onboarding.js
289 ms
v652eace1692a40cfa3763df669d7439c1639079717194
146 ms
publishertag.js
223 ms
rid
315 ms
pubads_impl_2022092601.js
162 ms
ppub_config
264 ms
gen_204
205 ms
firebase-performance-standalone.js
194 ms
close_2px-white-banner.svg
138 ms
icon-premium-badge-green.svg
134 ms
avtalk.svg
136 ms
login_unactive_2px-white.svg
139 ms
ccpa-cta-icon.svg
136 ms
loading_32.gif
135 ms
pixel.png
157 ms
0.png
156 ms
spinner.png
155 ms
airline_logo.png
156 ms
fr24-logo-no-payoff.svg
157 ms
pin_2px.svg
151 ms
premium_lock.svg
174 ms
cesium_logo.svg
172 ms
bing-maps-logo-small-white.png
207 ms
black_friday_promo_2020_cta.png
177 ms
black_friday_promo_2020_all_plans.png
178 ms
map.view.3d.basic.jpg
191 ms
spinner_light_green.svg
183 ms
black_friday_promo_2021.png
179 ms
59302966
126 ms
chat.flightradar24.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
chat.flightradar24.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
chat.flightradar24.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chat.flightradar24.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chat.flightradar24.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chat.flightradar24.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chat Flightradar24. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: