1.1 sec in total
253 ms
635 ms
177 ms
Visit facehoc.com now to see the best up-to-date Facehoc content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about facehoc.com
facehoc.com
Visit facehoc.comWe analyzed Facehoc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 253 ms and then it took 812 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
facehoc.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value3.6 s
60/100
25%
Value2.9 s
94/100
10%
Value170 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.053
98/100
15%
Value3.8 s
90/100
10%
253 ms
14 ms
14 ms
17 ms
15 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Facehoc.com, 72% (21 requests) were made to Images.smartname.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (293 ms) relates to the external source Images.smartname.com.
Page size can be reduced by 147.0 kB (31%)
480.8 kB
333.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Facehoc.com main page is 480.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 218.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Facehoc images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 102.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 102.2 kB or 48% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Facehoc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (32%)
28
19
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Facehoc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
facehoc.com
253 ms
frontend.js
14 ms
cookies.js
14 ms
jquery-1.6.4.min.js
17 ms
Glassy_CAF.css
15 ms
general.js
15 ms
nmads_caf.js
16 ms
google_afd_CAF.js
35 ms
caf.js
48 ms
nm_ga_top.js
35 ms
nm_ga_bottom.js
36 ms
caf.gif
32 ms
main-bg-pattern.png
15 ms
ga.js
29 ms
search-bg.png
7 ms
logo-badge-bg.png
9 ms
main-content-bg.png
11 ms
left-nav-bg.png
7 ms
main-photo-bg.png
7 ms
2col_lg_2_women_1_man_black_suits_laptop_drinking_coffee.jpg
293 ms
bottom-section-box-bg.png
10 ms
3col_sm_group_of_business_men_at_board_room_meeting.jpg
171 ms
3col_sm_group_of_young_people_on_park_bench.jpg
170 ms
divider-bar.png
10 ms
footer-bg-pattern.jpg
12 ms
slave.html
19 ms
domainpark.cgi
165 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
__utm.gif
20 ms
facehoc.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
facehoc.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
facehoc.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Facehoc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Facehoc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
facehoc.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Facehoc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: