4.2 sec in total
482 ms
1.6 sec
2.2 sec
Visit failpipe.com now to see the best up-to-date Failpipe content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about failpipe.com
, Ultimate fail collection (Videos), leanback playlist of stupid things
Visit failpipe.comWe analyzed Failpipe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 482 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
failpipe.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value4.2 s
45/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value840 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
482 ms
433 ms
12 ms
467 ms
630 ms
Our browser made a total of 146 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Failpipe.com, 82% (120 requests) were made to I2.ytimg.com and 3% (5 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (630 ms) belongs to the original domain Failpipe.com.
Page size can be reduced by 154.4 kB (8%)
2.0 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Failpipe.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Failpipe images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 80.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 80.5 kB or 53% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Failpipe.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (7%)
144
134
The browser has sent 144 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Failpipe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
failpipe.com
482 ms
design.css
433 ms
show_ads.js
12 ms
logo.png
467 ms
jquery.js
630 ms
player.js
464 ms
control.js
464 ms
mqdefault.jpg
112 ms
mqdefault.jpg
82 ms
mqdefault.jpg
93 ms
mqdefault.jpg
106 ms
mqdefault.jpg
89 ms
mqdefault.jpg
107 ms
mqdefault.jpg
88 ms
mqdefault.jpg
103 ms
mqdefault.jpg
103 ms
mqdefault.jpg
160 ms
mqdefault.jpg
183 ms
mqdefault.jpg
170 ms
mqdefault.jpg
162 ms
mqdefault.jpg
171 ms
mqdefault.jpg
167 ms
mqdefault.jpg
168 ms
mqdefault.jpg
175 ms
mqdefault.jpg
187 ms
mqdefault.jpg
178 ms
mqdefault.jpg
172 ms
mqdefault.jpg
171 ms
mqdefault.jpg
172 ms
mqdefault.jpg
175 ms
mqdefault.jpg
176 ms
mqdefault.jpg
177 ms
mqdefault.jpg
187 ms
mqdefault.jpg
181 ms
mqdefault.jpg
178 ms
mqdefault.jpg
179 ms
mqdefault.jpg
181 ms
mqdefault.jpg
223 ms
mqdefault.jpg
183 ms
mqdefault.jpg
212 ms
mqdefault.jpg
183 ms
mqdefault.jpg
185 ms
mqdefault.jpg
208 ms
ca-pub-7847614156403882.js
85 ms
zrt_lookup.html
147 ms
show_ads_impl.js
84 ms
mqdefault.jpg
136 ms
mqdefault.jpg
132 ms
mqdefault.jpg
133 ms
mqdefault.jpg
128 ms
mqdefault.jpg
127 ms
mqdefault.jpg
117 ms
mqdefault.jpg
121 ms
mqdefault.jpg
122 ms
ads
248 ms
mqdefault.jpg
106 ms
osd.js
103 ms
mqdefault.jpg
100 ms
mqdefault.jpg
97 ms
mqdefault.jpg
105 ms
mqdefault.jpg
98 ms
mqdefault.jpg
103 ms
mqdefault.jpg
103 ms
mqdefault.jpg
102 ms
mqdefault.jpg
104 ms
mqdefault.jpg
102 ms
mqdefault.jpg
100 ms
mqdefault.jpg
100 ms
mqdefault.jpg
101 ms
mqdefault.jpg
101 ms
mqdefault.jpg
100 ms
mqdefault.jpg
101 ms
mqdefault.jpg
98 ms
mqdefault.jpg
95 ms
mqdefault.jpg
110 ms
mqdefault.jpg
96 ms
mqdefault.jpg
98 ms
mqdefault.jpg
96 ms
mqdefault.jpg
96 ms
mqdefault.jpg
96 ms
ga.js
77 ms
mqdefault.jpg
77 ms
mqdefault.jpg
72 ms
mqdefault.jpg
73 ms
mqdefault.jpg
70 ms
mqdefault.jpg
73 ms
mqdefault.jpg
70 ms
mqdefault.jpg
74 ms
mqdefault.jpg
67 ms
mqdefault.jpg
66 ms
mqdefault.jpg
67 ms
mqdefault.jpg
68 ms
ads
260 ms
all.js
105 ms
mqdefault.jpg
98 ms
mqdefault.jpg
91 ms
mqdefault.jpg
86 ms
mqdefault.jpg
123 ms
mqdefault.jpg
82 ms
mqdefault.jpg
79 ms
mqdefault.jpg
81 ms
mqdefault.jpg
83 ms
mqdefault.jpg
80 ms
mqdefault.jpg
80 ms
mqdefault.jpg
115 ms
mqdefault.jpg
114 ms
mqdefault.jpg
114 ms
mqdefault.jpg
112 ms
mqdefault.jpg
112 ms
mqdefault.jpg
115 ms
mqdefault.jpg
130 ms
mqdefault.jpg
126 ms
mqdefault.jpg
129 ms
mqdefault.jpg
126 ms
mqdefault.jpg
110 ms
mqdefault.jpg
111 ms
mqdefault.jpg
111 ms
mqdefault.jpg
141 ms
mqdefault.jpg
120 ms
mqdefault.jpg
120 ms
mqdefault.jpg
140 ms
mqdefault.jpg
138 ms
mqdefault.jpg
122 ms
mqdefault.jpg
122 ms
mqdefault.jpg
141 ms
mqdefault.jpg
121 ms
mqdefault.jpg
141 ms
mqdefault.jpg
141 ms
mqdefault.jpg
135 ms
ads
239 ms
__utm.gif
66 ms
mqdefault.jpg
82 ms
mqdefault.jpg
85 ms
mqdefault.jpg
81 ms
mqdefault.jpg
78 ms
mqdefault.jpg
83 ms
mqdefault.jpg
83 ms
208 ms
xd_arbiter.php
39 ms
xd_arbiter.php
46 ms
6706848852004267309
60 ms
abg.js
73 ms
m_js_controller.js
87 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
63 ms
s
43 ms
x_button_blue2.png
42 ms
failpipe.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
failpipe.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
failpipe.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Failpipe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Failpipe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
failpipe.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Failpipe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: