1.7 sec in total
79 ms
844 ms
768 ms
Visit fancyhands.com now to see the best up-to-date Fancy Hands content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fancyhands.com
Visit fancyhands.comWe analyzed Fancyhands.com page load time and found that the first response time was 79 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
fancyhands.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value14.6 s
0/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value1,880 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.062
97/100
15%
Value14.5 s
9/100
10%
79 ms
148 ms
55 ms
67 ms
44 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Fancyhands.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net and 6% (3 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (425 ms) belongs to the original domain Fancyhands.com.
Page size can be reduced by 443.3 kB (15%)
3.0 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Fancyhands.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 180.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fancy Hands images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 195.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 195.4 kB or 20% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fancyhands.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (40%)
45
27
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fancy Hands. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fancyhands.com
79 ms
www.fancyhands.com
148 ms
css2
55 ms
app.min.css
67 ms
slick.css
44 ms
slick-theme.css
57 ms
js
156 ms
email-decode.min.js
37 ms
jquery.min.js
45 ms
jquery-ui.css
48 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
53 ms
jquery.qtip.min.css
54 ms
jquery.qtip.min.js
127 ms
plugins.js
47 ms
braintree.js
44 ms
_main.min.js
185 ms
settings.js
184 ms
all-bundle.js
196 ms
react-vendors-bundle.js
198 ms
slick.min.js
50 ms
fbevents.js
109 ms
bg3-desat.jpg
255 ms
fh-standard-2040x440.png
82 ms
fh-default-avatar.png
155 ms
notepad-top.png
156 ms
Av-2.png
249 ms
Av-4.png
155 ms
Av-6.png
156 ms
alexis-ohanian.png
251 ms
amanda-steinberg-avatar.png
252 ms
gabriel-weinberg-avatar.png
252 ms
nick-loper-avatar.png
251 ms
david-kadavy-avatar.png
252 ms
new-york-times-logo-light.png
306 ms
time-logo-light.png
385 ms
life-hacker-logo-light.png
253 ms
forbes-logo-light.png
306 ms
slate-logo-light.png
386 ms
noise.png
387 ms
mj5-ded-phone.jpg
387 ms
default-avatar-250x250.png
389 ms
trello-one.png
388 ms
trello-three.png
386 ms
trello-two.png
411 ms
personal-touch.png
425 ms
js
129 ms
ajax-loader.gif
67 ms
FancIcons.ttf
80 ms
Ycm2sZJORluHnXbITm4.ttf
34 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf
51 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf
52 ms
slick.woff
11 ms
fancyhands.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
fancyhands.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
fancyhands.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fancyhands.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Fancyhands.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fancyhands.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fancy Hands. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: