Tools & Wizards About Us
fansgol.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

fansgol.com

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

229 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

217 ms

fansgol.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to fansgol.com homepage info - get ready to check Fansgol best content for Colombia right away, or after learning these important things about fansgol.com

Visit fansgol.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fansgol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 229 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fansgol.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fansgol.com

229 ms

www.fansgol.com

917 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

92 ms

bbpress.css

180 ms

edd.min.css

176 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Fansgol.com, 13% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (917 ms) belongs to the original domain Fansgol.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 548.3 kB (73%)

Content Size

749.9 kB

After Optimization

201.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fansgol.com main page is 749.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 302.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 10.4 kB

  • Original 14.9 kB
  • After minification 14.2 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.4 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 220.4 kB

  • Original 302.8 kB
  • After minification 82.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fansgol needs image optimization as it can save up to 220.4 kB or 73% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 198.8 kB

  • Original 286.9 kB
  • After minification 270.5 kB
  • After compression 88.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 198.8 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 118.8 kB

  • Original 145.4 kB
  • After minification 126.0 kB
  • After compression 26.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fansgol.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 118.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (68%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fansgol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fansgol.com

fansgol.com

229 ms

www.fansgol.com

www.fansgol.com

917 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

92 ms

bbpress.css

bbpress.css

180 ms

edd.min.css

edd.min.css

176 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

181 ms

gamebox.css

gamebox.css

183 ms

bar.css

bar.css

182 ms

tipsy.css

tipsy.css

184 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

264 ms

front.css

front.css

264 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

353 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

268 ms

edd-ajax.min.js

edd-ajax.min.js

268 ms

jquery.tipsy.js

jquery.tipsy.js

268 ms

jquery.countdown.js

jquery.countdown.js

348 ms

front.js

front.js

349 ms

estilos2016.css

estilos2016.css

350 ms

style.css

style.css

350 ms

scc-acordion.css

scc-acordion.css

375 ms

slim-081711.css

slim-081711.css

33 ms

editor.js

editor.js

433 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

440 ms

gamebox.js

gamebox.js

436 ms

bar.js

bar.js

437 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

439 ms

index-acordion.js

index-acordion.js

438 ms

css

css

66 ms

css

css

78 ms

logo.png

logo.png

509 ms

mac-home.png

mac-home.png

249 ms

l1.png

l1.png

202 ms

l2.png

l2.png

202 ms

l3.png

l3.png

201 ms

l4.png

l4.png

424 ms

l5.png

l5.png

442 ms

l7.png

l7.png

271 ms

bg-tile.png

bg-tile.png

195 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

396 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

88 ms

mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

89 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

100 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

102 ms

gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xD1GzwQ5qF9DNzkQQVRhJ4g.ttf

gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xD1GzwQ5qF9DNzkQQVRhJ4g.ttf

103 ms

gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xJhsE6jcpsD2oq89kgohWx0.ttf

gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xJhsE6jcpsD2oq89kgohWx0.ttf

111 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

61 ms

collect

collect

32 ms

Accessibility Review

fansgol.com accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

fansgol.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

fansgol.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fansgol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Spanish. Our system also found out that Fansgol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fansgol.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fansgol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: