Tools & Wizards About Us
fashionmark.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

fashionmark.com

Fashionmark Solutions - Pattern Management - Vancouver

Page Load Speed

980 ms in total

First Response

171 ms

Resources Loaded

604 ms

Page Rendered

205 ms

fashionmark.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Fashionmark content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fashionmark.com

Fashionmark Solutions is an automated pattern management service bureau located in Vancouver, Canada. Using the latest technology, we provide customers with accurate patterns, expert grading and effic...

Visit fashionmark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fashionmark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 171 ms and then it took 809 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fashionmark.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

64/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value670 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fashionmark.com

171 ms

styles.css

26 ms

count.js

229 ms

upper-1.gif

31 ms

upper-2.gif

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Fashionmark.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Count.carrierzone.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (231 ms) belongs to the original domain Fashionmark.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 42.9 kB (83%)

Content Size

52.0 kB

After Optimization

9.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fashionmark.com main page is 52.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 36.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 12.2 kB

  • Original 15.3 kB
  • After minification 13.5 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 30.6 kB

  • Original 36.0 kB
  • After minification 23.8 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 30.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 159 B

  • Original 640 B
  • After minification 640 B
  • After compression 481 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fashionmark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 159 B or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (59%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fashionmark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fashionmark.com

fashionmark.com

171 ms

styles.css

styles.css

26 ms

count.js

count.js

229 ms

upper-1.gif

upper-1.gif

31 ms

upper-2.gif

upper-2.gif

63 ms

clear.gif

clear.gif

63 ms

upper-3.gif

upper-3.gif

62 ms

upper-left.gif

upper-left.gif

52 ms

upper-main-bg.gif

upper-main-bg.gif

70 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

60 ms

header.gif

header.gif

79 ms

pattern-making.gif

pattern-making.gif

88 ms

vert-lines.gif

vert-lines.gif

85 ms

grading.gif

grading.gif

84 ms

marker-making2.gif

marker-making2.gif

83 ms

specsheets2.gif

specsheets2.gif

101 ms

aboutthecompany.gif

aboutthecompany.gif

102 ms

contactpricing.gif

contactpricing.gif

108 ms

wheretofindus.gif

wheretofindus.gif

111 ms

upper-right.gif

upper-right.gif

109 ms

right-1.gif

right-1.gif

110 ms

upper-left-btm.gif

upper-left-btm.gif

156 ms

upper-btm.gif

upper-btm.gif

155 ms

upper-right-btm.gif

upper-right-btm.gif

155 ms

lower-1.gif

lower-1.gif

151 ms

lower-top.gif

lower-top.gif

149 ms

lower-2.gif

lower-2.gif

149 ms

lower-3.gif

lower-3.gif

171 ms

lower-left.gif

lower-left.gif

169 ms

lower-main-bg.gif

lower-main-bg.gif

169 ms

pattern.gif

pattern.gif

171 ms

grading.gif

grading.gif

170 ms

markers.gif

markers.gif

170 ms

specs.gif

specs.gif

191 ms

patterns-text.gif

patterns-text.gif

229 ms

grading-text.gif

grading-text.gif

231 ms

markers-text.gif

markers-text.gif

231 ms

specs-text.gif

specs-text.gif

231 ms

lower-right.gif

lower-right.gif

231 ms

lower-right-2.gif

lower-right-2.gif

226 ms

lower-left-btm.gif

lower-left-btm.gif

204 ms

lower-btm-1.gif

lower-btm-1.gif

210 ms

lower-btm-2.gif

lower-btm-2.gif

208 ms

lower-right-btm.gif

lower-right-btm.gif

210 ms

ctin.php

ctin.php

140 ms

aboutthecompany_on.gif

aboutthecompany_on.gif

32 ms

contactpricing_on.gif

contactpricing_on.gif

35 ms

wheretofindus_on.gif

wheretofindus_on.gif

33 ms

pattern_on.gif

pattern_on.gif

32 ms

grading_on.gif

grading_on.gif

33 ms

markers_on.gif

markers_on.gif

32 ms

specs_on.gif

specs_on.gif

51 ms

pattern-making_on.gif

pattern-making_on.gif

53 ms

grading_on.gif

grading_on.gif

53 ms

marker-making1_on.gif

marker-making1_on.gif

53 ms

specsheets1_on.gif

specsheets1_on.gif

55 ms

lower-4.gif

lower-4.gif

54 ms

Accessibility Review

fashionmark.com accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

fashionmark.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

fashionmark.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fashionmark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Fashionmark.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

fashionmark.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fashionmark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: