3.3 sec in total
147 ms
2.8 sec
392 ms
Click here to check amazing Fatpipeinc content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fatpipeinc.com
FatPipe's SD-WAN (Software-Defined WAN) products provide solutions for an easy migration to Hybrid WAN. FatPipe SD-WAN to improve application performance and reliability, WAN Optimiztion, WAN Load Bal...
Visit fatpipeinc.comWe analyzed Fatpipeinc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
fatpipeinc.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value1,380 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.257
48/100
15%
Value18.1 s
3/100
10%
147 ms
448 ms
865 ms
947 ms
930 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Fatpipeinc.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Chat.fatpipeinc.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Fatpipeinc.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (25%)
5.7 MB
4.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Fatpipeinc.com main page is 5.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 72.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.1 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 75.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fatpipeinc images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 772.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 772.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 507.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fatpipeinc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 507.4 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (63%)
75
28
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fatpipeinc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fatpipeinc.com
147 ms
www.fatpipeinc.com
448 ms
animate.css
865 ms
bootstrap.css
947 ms
bootstrap.min.css
930 ms
font-awesome.css
897 ms
1.css
939 ms
settings.css
870 ms
jssor.js
1083 ms
jssor.slider.js
1136 ms
jquery-1.8.3.js
1191 ms
html5shiv.js
1020 ms
respond.min.js
1023 ms
image.php
215 ms
component.css
965 ms
css_003.css
1032 ms
css.css
1042 ms
css_002.css
1043 ms
normalize.css
1103 ms
colorbox.css
1106 ms
helpers.css
1110 ms
skin.css
1122 ms
layerslider.css
1165 ms
award.css
1194 ms
tab.css
1195 ms
alb_num.js
1196 ms
twitterFetcher_min.js
1195 ms
modernizr-2.js
1230 ms
bootstrap.js
1230 ms
imagesloaded.js
1290 ms
masonry.js
1289 ms
less-1.js
1392 ms
jquery_002.js
1290 ms
jquery_003.js
1290 ms
jquery.js
1310 ms
jquery-easing-1.js
1392 ms
jquery-transit-modified.js
1392 ms
layerslider_002.js
1392 ms
conversion.js
13 ms
js
5 ms
layerslider.js
1418 ms
biss.js
615 ms
jquery.twbsPagination.min.js
613 ms
jquery.flexisel.js
585 ms
logo.png
276 ms
shadow-01.png
376 ms
new-big-screen-vpn01.png
766 ms
new-big-screen-warp.png
1013 ms
new-vpn-big-screen.png
785 ms
new-obama-inauguration.png
847 ms
line_down_arrow.png
375 ms
cloud-provider.jpg
680 ms
hospital.jpg
745 ms
manufacturing.jpg
937 ms
finance.jpg
877 ms
awardv1.png
837 ms
awardv2.png
853 ms
awardv3.png
907 ms
awardv4.png
914 ms
analytics.js
45 ms
awardv5.png
918 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
933 ms
menu-bg.png
966 ms
b21.png
966 ms
a21.png
967 ms
chat-lady.png
966 ms
collect
61 ms
server.php
290 ms
collect
133 ms
LKf8nhXsWg5ybwEGXk8UBQ.woff
107 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
110 ms
Q_pTky3Sc3ubRibGToTAYiylde52zikAzebNtJS89aM.woff
206 ms
UyYrYy3ltEffJV9QueSi4RdbPw3QSf9R-kE0EsQUn2A.woff
184 ms
ga-audiences
99 ms
45 ms
server.php
297 ms
resource.php
340 ms
resource.php
183 ms
17 ms
button-previous.png
361 ms
button-next.png
383 ms
in.php
134 ms
resource.php
350 ms
resource.php
278 ms
fatpipeinc.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
fatpipeinc.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
fatpipeinc.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fatpipeinc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fatpipeinc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fatpipeinc.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fatpipeinc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: