5.8 sec in total
290 ms
3.6 sec
1.9 sec
Visit faveton.com now to see the best up-to-date Faveton content for Spain and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about faveton.com
Ventilated façades in terracotta and porcelain developed by our team that improve the energy efficiency and thermal insulation of the building.
Visit faveton.comWe analyzed Faveton.com page load time and found that the first response time was 290 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
faveton.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value17.8 s
0/100
25%
Value10.7 s
7/100
10%
Value1,280 ms
18/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value17.2 s
4/100
10%
290 ms
731 ms
79 ms
285 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Faveton.com, 25% (25 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Faveton.com.
Page size can be reduced by 924.2 kB (39%)
2.4 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Faveton.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 923.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 923.9 kB or 93% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 361 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Faveton images are well optimized though.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (84%)
74
12
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Faveton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
faveton.com
290 ms
731 ms
js
79 ms
style.min.css
285 ms
css
41 ms
menu-animation.min.css
201 ms
frontend.css
279 ms
premium-addons.min.css
498 ms
styles.css
297 ms
contact-form-7-main.min.css
296 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
298 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
301 ms
frontend.min.css
380 ms
swiper.min.css
395 ms
post-5099.css
394 ms
animate.css
512 ms
sliders.min.css
398 ms
icomoon.css
477 ms
lae-frontend.css
492 ms
lae-grid.css
494 ms
lae-widgets.min.css
609 ms
frontend.min.css
590 ms
all.min.css
687 ms
v4-shims.min.css
611 ms
global.css
604 ms
post-2618.css
613 ms
jquery.lazyloadxt.spinner.css
693 ms
a3_lazy_load.min.css
689 ms
general.min.css
693 ms
css
37 ms
fontawesome.min.css
783 ms
solid.min.css
698 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
782 ms
breeze-prefetch-links.min.js
804 ms
jquery.min.js
806 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
805 ms
v4-shims.min.js
805 ms
animations.min.css
1022 ms
prettyphoto.min.css
1022 ms
post-6311.css
1022 ms
style.min.js
1022 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
937 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
921 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
840 ms
hooks.min.js
826 ms
i18n.min.js
825 ms
index.js
824 ms
index.js
821 ms
jquery.lazyloadxt.extra.min.js
735 ms
jquery.lazyloadxt.srcset.min.js
728 ms
jquery.lazyloadxt.extend.js
728 ms
general.min.js
724 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
646 ms
prettyPhoto.min.js
631 ms
isotope.min.js
615 ms
premium-addons.min.js
821 ms
waypoints.min.js
818 ms
lottie.min.js
886 ms
jquery-numerator.min.js
719 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
716 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
713 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
889 ms
frontend.min.js
817 ms
core.min.js
813 ms
frontend.min.js
807 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
812 ms
logo-150x35.png
822 ms
lazy_placeholder.gif
823 ms
loading.gif
824 ms
THE-ORCHARD_ceram_glazed_blue_ventilated_facade_cladding_terracotta_4.jpg
893 ms
WAFRA-LIVING_ventilated_facade_cladding__baguette_louvers_solar_shading-terracotta-faveton_4.jpg
825 ms
THE-O-BUILDING_baguette_louvers_natural_ventilated_facade_cladding_terracotta_1.jpg
894 ms
PROMENADE_SHOPPING_MALL_FAVETON-glazed_terracotta_ventilated_facade_cladding_bricktile_2.jpg
702 ms
ELAR_2.jpg
805 ms
BEIJING-MARRIOT_ventilated_facade_cladding_terracotta_natural_colour_ceram28-faveton_5.jpg
638 ms
7-UANDES_2.jpg
807 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
366 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
366 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
365 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
366 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
382 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf
381 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfo.ttf
381 ms
S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-oPCc.ttf
380 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfo.ttf
382 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_Gwfo.ttf
380 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
467 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
467 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
468 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
467 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
467 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
468 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
469 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
473 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
472 ms
astra.woff
704 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
336 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
336 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
336 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
336 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
337 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
338 ms
faveton.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
faveton.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
faveton.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Faveton.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Faveton.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
faveton.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Faveton. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: